Cited by 15CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Prime-editing methods and pegRNA design programs

Mikhaylova, E. V., Kuluev, B. R., Gerashchenkov, G. A., Chemeris, D. A., Garafutdinov, R. R., Kuluev, A. R., Baymiev, An. K., Baymiev, Al. K. +1 more·2024·Molecular Biology

Abstract

Abstract—It has been 10 years since CRISPR/Cas technology was applied to edit the genomes of various organisms. Its ability to produce a double-strand break in a DNA region specified by the researcher started a revolution in bioengineering. Later, the Base Editing (BE) method was developed. BE is performed via the formation of single-strand breaks by the mutant form of Cas nuclease (nickase), fused with deaminases and other enzymes. It can be used to promote A $$ \leftrightarrow $$ G and C $$ \leftrightarrow $$ T transitions, and a C → G transversion. Just over 3 years ago, a new Prime Editing (PE) variant of CRISPR/Cas was invented. Unlike BE, in PE the nickase is fused with reverse transcriptase, capable of building a new DNA chain using the pegRNA template. The pegRNA consists of an elongated guide RNA with an extra sequence at the 3'-end. Prime editing makes it possible to insert the desired mutations into this extra sequence and to carry out any substitutions and indels of bases without the use of special donor DNA. To date, a number of PE variants have been proposed; they are briefly considered in this review with an emphasis on prime editing of plant genomes. Some attention is also paid to pegRNA design programs, as well as evaluation of the efficiency of the editing. Such a variety of PE techniques is due to the opportunities of high-precision introduction of desired changes with a rather low frequency of off-target mutations in the genomes of various organisms. The relatively low efficiency of prime editing inspires researchers to offer new approaches. There is hope that further development of the technology will improve PE enough to take its rightful place among the genome targeting methods that are suitable for any organisms, and will have a positive impact on the agricultural sector, industrial biotechnologies, and medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s0026893324010084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 15

Authors
Mikhaylova, E. V., Kuluev, B. R., Gerashchenkov, G. A., Chemeris, D. A., Garafutdinov, R. R., Kuluev, A. R., Baymiev, A. K., Baymiev, A. K., & Chemeris, A. V.
Affiliations
Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of Ufa Scientific Centre (RU)
Corresponding author
Mikhaylova, E. V.
Venue
Molecular Biology
Published
2024-02
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
17-32
ISSN
  • 0026-8933 (ISSN-L)
  • 1608-3245
OpenAlex
W4392565247
Cited by
15
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
prime editing, pegRNA design, CRISPR-Cas, base editing, reverse transcriptase, nickase, plant genome editing, off-target mutations, editing efficiency, genome editing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review