Micropropagation and Somaclonal Variation of Tulipa Suaveolens (Liliaceae) in Vitro
Abstract
The research was aimed at regenerating the Tulipa suaveolens Roth plants in vitro, examining their morphogenesis, and evaluating the plants’ genetic stability using molecular ISSR markers. Specimens of two genetically contrasting populations of protected T. suaveolens species were introduced into in vitro culture. Seedlings obtained from rape seeds cultivated under low temperatures for 3 months were used as donor material for clonal micropropagation. The selection of clonal micropropagation protocol was chosen on the basis of the data from literature. In specimens of both populations of T. suaveolens, the major stages of in vitro morphogenenis run simultaneously and in accordance with the protocol. It was revealed that bulblets are formed via direct organogenesis. Despite the morphological correspondence between the regenerated and intact plants, ISSR analysis identified a relatively high degree of somaclonal variability (13.9−15.8%). In ISSR patterns of regenerated plants, unique fragments completely lacking in specimens of the donor population were found.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using molecular markers is one of the reliable methods to identify and characterize desirable variants that prevent the propagation of deleterious variants.
“using molecular markers is one of the reliable methods to identify and characterize desirable variants that prevent the propagation of deleterious variants [169].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [169]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Kritskaya, T. A., Kashin, A. S., & Kasatkin, M. Y.
- Affiliations
- Saratov State University (RU)
- Venue
- Russian Journal of Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Pleiades Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 209-215
- ISSN
- 1062-3604 (ISSN-L)
- 1608-3326
- OpenAlex
- W2970883756
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Russian Journal of Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- micropropagation, somaclonal variation, in vitro regeneration, ISSR markers, genetic stability, direct organogenesis, bulblet formation, Liliaceae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review