Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study

Open access
Larroque, B, Bréart, G, Kaminski, M, Dehan, M, André, M, Burguet, A, Grandjean, H, Ledésert, B, Lévêque, C, Maillard, F, Matis, J, Rozé, J C, Truffert, P·2004·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome for all infants born before 33 weeks gestation until discharge from hospital. Design: A prospective observational population based study. Setting: Nine regions of France in 1997. Patients: All births or late terminations of pregnancy for fetal or maternal reasons between 22 and 32 weeks gestation. Main outcome measure: Life status: stillbirth, live birth, death in delivery room, death in intensive care, decision to limit intensive care, survival to discharge. Results: A total of 722 late terminations, 772 stillbirths, and 2901 live births were recorded. The incidence of very preterm births was 1.3 per 100 live births and stillbirths. The survival rate for births between 22 and 32 weeks was 67% of all births (including stillbirths), 85% of live births, and 89% of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Survival increased with gestational age: 31% of all infants born alive at 24 weeks survived to discharge, 78% at 28 weeks, and 97% at 32 weeks. Survival among live births was lower for small for gestational age infants, multiple births, and boys. Overall, 50% of deaths after birth followed decisions to withhold or withdraw intensive care: 66% of deaths in the delivery room, decreasing with increasing gestational age; 44% of deaths in the neonatal intensive care unit, with little variation with gestational age. Conclusion: Among very preterm babies, chances of survival varies greatly according to the length of gestation. At all gestational ages, a large proportion of deaths are associated with a decision to limit intensive care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2002.020396

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Larroque, B., Bréart, G., Kaminski, M., Dehan, M., André, M., Burguet, A., Grandjean, H., Ledésert, B., Lévêque, C., Maillard, F., Matis, J., Rozé, J. C., & Truffert, P.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-03
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
F139-F144
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2125275343
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2002.020396
The paper
Larroque, B., Bréart, G., Kaminski, M., Dehan, M., André, M., Burguet, A., Grandjean, H., Ledésert, B., Lévêque, C., Maillard, F., Matis, J., Rozé, J. C., & Truffert, P. (2004). Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2002.020396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.