The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure study
Abstract
Aim: To assess academic attainment and special educational needs (SEN) in extremely preterm children in middle childhood. Methods: Of 307 extremely preterm (⩽25 weeks) survivors born in the UK and Ireland in 1995, 219 (71%) were re-assessed at 11 years of age and compared to 153 classmates born at term, using standardised tests of cognitive ability and academic attainment and teacher reports of school performance and SEN. Multiple imputation was used to correct for selective dropout. Results: Extremely preterm children had significantly lower scores than classmates for cognitive ability (−20 points; 95% CI −23 to −17), reading (−18 points; −22 to −15) and mathematics (−27 points; −31 to −23). Twenty nine (13%) extremely preterm children attended special school. In mainstream schools, 105 (57%) extremely preterm children had SEN (OR 10; 6 to 18) and 103 (55%) required SEN resource provision (OR 10; 6 to 18). Teachers rated 50% of extremely preterm children as having below average attainment compared with 5% of classmates (OR 18; 8 to 41). Extremely preterm children who entered compulsory education an academic year early due to preterm birth had similar academic attainment but required more SEN support (OR 2; 1.0 to 3.6). Conclusions: Extremely preterm survivors remain at high risk for learning impairments and poor academic attainment in middle childhood. A significant proportion require full-time specialist education and over half of those attending mainstream schools require additional health or educational resources to access the national curriculum. The prevalence and impact of SEN are likely to increase as these children approach the transition to secondary school.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes of School-Aged Children Who Were Born Preterm: A Meta-analysis
Bhutta, A. T., Cleves, M. A., Casey, P. H., Cradock, M. M., & Anand, K. J. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.6.728 · Cited by 2,392
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640801982312 · Cited by 1,544
Cited by
Autism Spectrum Disorders in Extremely Preterm Children
Johnson, S., Hollis, C., Kochhar, P., Hennessy, E., Wolke, D., & Marlow, N. (2010) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.041 · Cited by 366
Self-citationNeurodevelopmental Outcome After Extreme Prematurity: A Review of the Literature
Jarjour, I. T. (2015) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.10.027 · Cited by 299
Socio-Emotional Development Following Very Preterm Birth: Pathways to Psychopathology
Montagna, A., & Nosarti, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00080 · Cited by 239
Automatic quantification of normal cortical folding patterns from fetal brain MRI
Wright, R., Kyriakopoulou, V., Ledig, C., Rutherford, M. A., Hajnal, J. V., Rueckert, D., & Aljabar, P. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.034 · Cited by 134
Wolke, D., Strauss, V. Y.-C., Johnson, S., Gilmore, C., Marlow, N., & Jaekel, J. (2015) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.065 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S., Hennessy, E., Smith, R., Trikic, R., Wolke, D., & Marlow, N.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-03-12
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- F283-F289
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2068948958
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.