The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients. DESIGN: Prospective review of drug charts to identify prescribing errors and prospective observation of nurses preparing and administering drugs to identify medication administration errors. In addition, incident reports were collected for each ward studied. PARTICIPANTS: Paediatric patients admitted to hospitals and nurses administering medications to these patients. SETTING: 11 wards (prescribing errors) and 10 wards (medication administration errors) across five hospitals (one specialist children's teaching hospital, one nonteaching hospital and three teaching hospitals) in the London area (UK). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number, types and incidence of prescribing and medication administration errors, using practitioner-based definitions. RESULTS: 391 prescribing errors were identified, giving an overall prescribing error rate of 13.2% of medication orders (95% CI 12.0 to 14.5). There was great variation in prescribing error rates between wards. Incomplete prescriptions were the most common type of prescribing error, and dosing errors the third most common. 429 medication administration errors were identified; giving an overall incidence of 19.1% (95% CI 17.5% to 20.7%) erroneous administrations. Errors in drug preparation were the most common, followed by incorrect rates of intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing and medication administration errors are not uncommon in paediatrics, partly as a result of the extra challenges in prescribing and administering medication to this patient group. The causes and extent of these errors need to be explored locally and improvement strategies pursued.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Runciman, W. B. (2002) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.11.3.246 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England
Elliott, R. A., Camacho, E., Jankovic, D., Sculpher, M. J., & Faria, R. (2021) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghaleb, M. A., Barber, N., Franklin, B. D., & Wong, I. C. K.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-118
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2131656542
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2009.158485
- The paper
- Ghaleb, M. A., Barber, N., Franklin, B. D., & Wong, I. C. K. (2010). The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.158485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.