Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metabolic Abnormalities Detected in a Survey of Mentally Backward Individuals in Northern Ireland

Open access
Carson, N. A. J., Neill, D. W.·1962·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine concordance rate between functional MRI (fMRI) and Wada test for language lateralization in our cohort of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. BACKGROUND: Preoperative fMRI is a non-invasive test that has been used increasingly in the epilepsy surgery centers to lateralize language. However, concordance rate between fMRI and Wada test has been variable in different studies. We report our local experience. DESIGN/METHODS: Patients with intractable focal epilepsy were studied for language lateralization using fMRI and Wada testing between 2007 and 2014. Three language paradigm tasks were used for fMRI studies: verb generation, sentence completion and naming. fMRI laterality indices were defined as a ratio (L-R)/(L+R) between the number of activated voxels in the left and right ROIs for Brodmann areas 44+45+46+8+9 (Anterior Language Area, ALA) and 22+39+40 (Posterior Language Area, PLA). fMRI and Wada results were divided into the right, left or bilateral hemispheric language dominance. RESULTS: 28 patients (15 men) were studied. Mean age at seizure onset was 19.3±14.57 years, and the mean age at fMRI was 34.8±12.48 years. 17 patients had left temporal epilepsy (TLE), 6 right TLE, 3 bilateral TLE, 1 left frontal and 1 multifocal epilepsy. The concordance rate between Wada and fMRI tests for the ALA and PLA was 68.2[percnt] and 52.2[percnt] for sentence completion; 56[percnt] and 52[percnt] for verb generation and 25[percnt] and 35[percnt] for naming paradigm, respectively. The concordance rate did not improve by combining the activation results of the 3 fMRI paradigms. Bilateral representation in Wada test or fMRI accounted for 68[percnt] of the discordant cases. CONCLUSIONS:Sentence completion and verb generation fMRI paradigms showed greater concordance with Wada test than naming paradigm. The higher discordance between the Wada test and fMRI was related to bilateral results suggestive of less stringent thresholds used for either test. Disclosure: Dr. Massot-Tarrus has nothing to disclose. Dr. Mousavi has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bihari has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hayman-Abello has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hayman-Abello has nothing to disclose. Dr. Mirsattari has nothing to disclose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.37.195.505

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Carson, N. A. J., & Neill, D. W.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1962-10-01
Volume
37
Issue
195
Pages
505-513
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2145734151
Cited by
491
References
0
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Abnormalities Detected in a Survey of Mentally Backward Individuals in Northern Ireland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.37.195.505
The paper
Carson, N. A. J., & Neill, D. W. (1962). Metabolic Abnormalities Detected in a Survey of Mentally Backward Individuals in Northern Ireland. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.37.195.505

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.