Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation

Open access
Robinson, R. J.·1977·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

Introduction Patients with a high output ileostomy often have hypomagnesaemia. Oral magnesium therapy may be unsuccessful. Topical magnesium therapy may offer a novel mode of replacement. This phase II clinical study using BetterYou magnesium oil spray primarily aimed to determine if the spray will maintain or increase serum magnesium in these patients. Methods Outpatients with an ileostomy formed more than 6 months prior to inclusion and having chronic hypomagnesaemia (serum magnesium level less than <0.66 mmol/L) at enrolment and either: (a) a further outpatient serum magnesium (Mg+2) level <0.66 mmol/L in the last 3 months, or (b) needing regular intravenous magnesium infusions at least once every 6 weeks for more than 18 weeks, were recruited. Exclusion criteria included severe hypomagnesaemia (<0.25 mmol/L), diuretic use, and medication alterations (including supplements and magnesium infusions) within 4 weeks of enrolment. Recruits applied 10 sprays twice daily for 6 weeks, delivering a topical elemental magnesium dose of 150 mg/day. Serum and whole cell Mg+2 levels were measured at enrolment, and at weeks 1, 3 and 6. Vitamin D levels were measured at enrolment; 24 hour urinary magnesium levels were measured at enrolment and week 6. Treatment response is defined as a serum Mg+2 level rise >0.10 mmol/L at week 6, or the avoidance of a planned magnesium infusion during the trial without a fall in serum Mg+2. Patients with serum Mg+2 <0.25 mmol/L or requiring additional magnesium supplementation during the study were withdrawn. Results 7 patients entered the study. 6 patients completed it; 1 was withdrawn at week 4 due to hospitalisation for Crohn’s disease. All 6 patients had normal enrolment vitamin D levels (>45 nmol/L), and 5 of 6 had 24 hour urinary magnesium levels below the minimum detection limit (<0.28 mmol/L). 1 of the 6 patients avoided their planned six-weekly magnesium infusion, maintaining a stable serum Mg+2 level (0.59 mmol/L at enrolment, 0.62 mmol/L at week 6) and increased 24-urinary magnesium output. 2 of the remaining 5 patients were treatment successes, with a serum Mg+2 rise of 0.27 and 0.13 respectively. No patient had a fall in serum Mg+2 of greater than 0.07 mmol/L between enrolment and week 6. Serum and whole cell Mg+2 correlation is strong and near linear (Pearson’s r=0.92, p<0.01). All 6 patients complained of muscle cramping at enrolment; 5 reported significant improvement or complete resolution of cramping by week 3. Conclusions 3 of 6 patients were treated successfully with BetterYou magnesium oil spray. Serum magnesium is a reliable surrogate for whole cell magnesium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.52.8.671-b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, R. J.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1977-08-01
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
671-672
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2052516108
Cited by
348
References
0
FWCI
31.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.52.8.671-b
The paper
Robinson, R. J. (1977). Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.52.8.671-b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.