The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicentre trial on feeding low birthweight infants: effects of diet on early growth.
Open accessAbstract
A large multicentre study on the short and long term clinical and developmental outcome of infants randomised to different diets is being undertaken. This report represents an interim analysis of the early postnatal growth performance of an unselected population of 194 preterm infants (gestation, mean (SD) 31 . 0 (2 . 9) weeks; birthweight, mean (SD) 1364 (294) g), both ill and well, examined in two (of four) parallel trials. One trial compared banked breast milk with a new preterm formula (primary trial); the other compared these diets as supplements to maternal milk (supplement trial). A major dietary effect on the number of days taken to regain birthweight and subsequent gains in weight, length, and head circumference was observed in the primary trial. Infants fed banked breast milk and weighing less than 1200 g at birth took a calculated additional three weeks to reach 2000 g compared with those fed on the preterm formula. A significant influence of diet on body proportions was seen in the relation between body weight, head circumference, and length. Similar though smaller differences in growth patterns were seen in the supplement trial. By the time they reach 2000 g, infants of birthweights 1200 to 1849 g fed on banked breast milk and infants below 1200 g fed on either banked breast milk or maternal milk supplemented (as necessary) with banked breast milk, fulfilled stringent criteria for failure to thrive (weight less than 2 SD below the mean for age). Only infants fed the preterm formula as their sole diet had maintained their birth centile by discharge from hospital. The misleading nature of comparisons between extrauterine and intrauterine steady state weight gains is emphasised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials
POCOCK, S. J. (1977) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/64.2.191 · Cited by 1,831
Cited by
Oken, E., & Gillman, M. W. (2003) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2003.69 · Cited by 912
Programming by Early Nutrition in Man
Lucas, A. (2007) · Novartis Foundation Symposia · doi:10.1002/9780470514047.ch4 · Cited by 908
Self-citationFormula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
Quigley, M., Embleton, N. D., & McGuire, W. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002971.pub4 · Cited by 719
Early nutrition in preterm infants and later blood pressure: two cohorts after randomised trials
Singhal, A., Cole, T. J., & Lucas, A. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04004-6 · Cited by 649
Self-citationLow nutrient intake and early growth for later insulin resistance in adolescents born preterm
Singhal, A., Fewtrell, M., Cole, T. J., & Lucas, A. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12895-4 · Cited by 594
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucas, A., Gore, S. M., Cole, T. J., Bamford, M. F., Dossetor, J. F., Barr, I., Dicarlo, L., Cork, S., & Lucas, P. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1984-08-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 722-730
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2160577595
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicentre trial on feeding low birthweight infants: effects of diet on early growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.59.8.722
- The paper
- Lucas, A., Gore, S. M., Cole, T. J., Bamford, M. F., Dossetor, J. F., Barr, I., Dicarlo, L., Cork, S., & Lucas, P. J. (1984). Multicentre trial on feeding low birthweight infants: effects of diet on early growth. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.59.8.722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.