The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response to dobutamine and dopamine in the hypotensive very preterm infant.
Open accessAbstract
A randomised double blind study was designed to evaluate haemodynamic response to dobutamine and dopamine in 20 hypotensive preterm infants of less than 32 weeks' gestation. Neonates initially received dopamine or dobutamine 5 micrograms/kg/min. If mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained below 31 mm Hg, the infusion rate was increased in increments of 5 micrograms/kg/min. If 20 micrograms/kg/min of the initial drug failed to achieve a MAP above 30 mm Hg, it was discontinued and the other drug was administered at the same infusion rate. Left ventricular output (LVO) was measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Mean (SE) MAP increased significantly from 24.4 (1.0) to 32.0 (1.4) mm Hg at a median dobutamine dosage of 20 micrograms/kg/min and from 25.6 (1.2) to 37.7 (1.5) mm Hg at a median dopamine dosage of 12.5 micrograms/kg/min. The percentage LVO increase was +21 (7)% with dobutamine compared with -14 (8)% with dopamine. Dobutamine failed to increase MAP above 30 mm Hg in six infants out of 10, whereas dopamine succeeded in all 10 infants. Six switches from dobutamine to dopamine were thus performed, providing a rise in MAP (29.2 (0.5) to 41.2 (2.0) mm Hg) and drop in LVO (356 (40) to 263 (36) ml/kg/min). These data indicate that dopamine is more effective than dobutamine in raising and maintaining MAP above 30 mm Hg; however dopamine does not increase LVO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Philip, A. G. S. (2005) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000151693.46655.66 · Cited by 592
Hypotensive Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Have Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow
Munro, M. J., Walker, A. M., & Barfield, C. P. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1073 · Cited by 268
Early determinants of right and left ventricular output in ventilated preterm infants.
Evans, N., & Kluckow, M. (1996) · Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/fn.74.2.f88 · Cited by 268
Kluckow, M., & Evans, N. (1996) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70114-2 · Cited by 252
Vasopressors for hypotensive shock
Gamper, G., Havel, C., Arrich, J., Losert, H., Pace, N. L., Müllner, M., & Herkner, H. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003709.pub4 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Roze, J. C., Tohier, C., Maingueneau, C., Lefevre, M., & Mouzard, A.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1993-07-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1 Spec No
- Pages
- 59-63
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W1992216549
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response to dobutamine and dopamine in the hypotensive very preterm infant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.69.1_spec_no.59
- The paper
- Roze, J. C., Tohier, C., Maingueneau, C., Lefevre, M., & Mouzard, A. (1993). Response to dobutamine and dopamine in the hypotensive very preterm infant. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.69.1_spec_no.59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.