The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysis
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of home visiting programmes on parenting and quality of the home environment. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature of randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies evaluating home visiting programmes involving at least one postnatal visit. SUBJECTS: Thirty four studies reported relevant outcomes; 26 used participants considered to be at risk of adverse maternal or child health outcomes; two used preterm or low birth weight infants; and two used infants with failure to thrive. Only eight used participants not considered to be at risk of adverse child health outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies reported Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) scores, 27 reported other measures of parenting, and 10 reported both types of outcome. Twelve studies were entered into the meta analysis. This showed a significant effect of home visiting on HOME score. Similar results were found after restricting the analyses to randomised controlled trials and to higher quality studies. Twenty one of the 27 studies reporting other measures of parenting found significant treatment effects favouring the home visited group on a range of measures. CONCLUSIONS: Home visiting programmes were associated with an improvement in the quality of the home environment. Few studies used UK health visitors, so caution must be exercised in extrapolating the results to current UK health visiting practice. Further work is needed to evaluate whether UK health visitors can achieve similar results. Comparisons with similar programmes delivered by paraprofessionals or community mothers are also needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: A Randomized Trial of Nurse Home Visitation
Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Chamberlin, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1986) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.78.1.65 · Cited by 947
Cited by
Responsive parenting: interventions and outcomes
Cabral de Mello, M. (2006) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.06.030163 · Cited by 324
Effectiveness of home visiting in improving child health and reducing child maltreatment
Avellar, S. A., & Supplee, L. H. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1021g · Cited by 273
Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., Sato, J., & Guptill, S. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301361 · Cited by 181
Stewart-Brown, S. L., & Schrader-Mcmillan, A. (2011) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dar056 · Cited by 110
Home visits during pregnancy and after birth for women with an alcohol or drug problem
Turnbull, C., & Osborn, D. A. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004456.pub3 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendrick, D.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 443-451
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127950202
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.82.6.443
- The paper
- Kendrick, D. (2000). Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.82.6.443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.