Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data

Open access
Gutman, David A, Cobb, Jake, Somanna, Dhananjaya, Park, Yuna, Wang, Fusheng, Kurc, Tahsin, Saltz, Joel H, Brat, Daniel J, Cooper, Lee A D, Kong, Jun·2013·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integration and visualization of multimodal datasets is a common challenge in biomedical informatics. Several recent studies of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data have illustrated important relationships between morphology observed in whole-slide images, outcome, and genetic events. The pairing of genomics and rich clinical descriptions with whole-slide imaging provided by TCGA presents a unique opportunity to perform these correlative studies. However, better tools are needed to integrate the vast and disparate data types. OBJECTIVE: To build an integrated web-based platform supporting whole-slide pathology image visualization and data integration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All images and genomic data were directly obtained from the TCGA and National Cancer Institute (NCI) websites. RESULTS: The Cancer Digital Slide Archive (CDSA) produced is accessible to the public (http://cancer.digitalslidearchive.net) and currently hosts more than 20,000 whole-slide images from 22 cancer types. DISCUSSION: The capabilities of CDSA are demonstrated using TCGA datasets to integrate pathology imaging with associated clinical, genomic and MRI measurements in glioblastomas and can be extended to other tumor types. CDSA also allows URL-based sharing of whole-slide images, and has preliminary support for directly sharing regions of interest and other annotations. Images can also be selected on the basis of other metadata, such as mutational profile, patient age, and other relevant characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing availability of whole-slide scanners, analysis of digitized pathology images will become increasingly important in linking morphologic observations with genomic and clinical endpoints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001469

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Gutman, D. A., Cobb, J., Somanna, D., Park, Y., Wang, F., Kurc, T., Saltz, J. H., Brat, D. J., Cooper, L. A. D., & Kong, J.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2013-11
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1091-1098
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2154813452
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001469
The paper
Gutman, D. A., Cobb, J., Somanna, D., Park, Y., Wang, F., Kurc, T., Saltz, J. H., Brat, D. J., Cooper, L. A. D., & Kong, J. (2013). Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.