SP0115 The link between long-term conditions and mental health
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with long-term conditions, comorbid mental health problems generate at least a 45% increase in total healthcare costs.
“The King's Fund reported that in patients with long-term conditions, comorbid mental health problem generate at least a 45% increase in total healthcare costs”
Better integrated physical and psychological services in the UK will produce cost savings as well as better care.
“and highlighted that better integrated physical and psychological services in the UK will produce cost savings as well as better care 1 .”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 18
- Authors
- Naylor, C.
- Affiliations
- King's Fund (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Naylor, C.
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 28-29
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063510427
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- chronic disease, mental health, cervical cancer, FIGO 2018 staging, stage migration, lymph node metastasis, sentinel lymph node mapping, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, parametrial invasion, early-stage cervical cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review