Cited by 8Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SAT0387 Psychometric Characteristics of the Italian Version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Using Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis

Ciapetti, A., Salaffi, F., Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., Sarzi Puttini, P., Ottonello, M.·2013·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ciapetti, A., Salaffi, F., Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., Sarzi Puttini, P., & Ottonello, M.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
72
Pages
A714
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322441933
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, Italian translation, cultural adaptation, psychometric properties, construct validity, Rasch analysis, classical test theory, factor analysis, reliability statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review