Cited by 2Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PP.70 Provision of Care at the Time of Stillbirth

Open access
O’Connell, O, Verling, AM, O’Donoghue, K·2013·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

Objective The multi-disciplinary bereavement team focuses on all aspects of care including emotional, medical and spiritual, in accordance with international evidence-based practise. While there are universal commonalities in the pain of grief involved in stillbirth, we wished to refine our practise based on the needs of our specific patient group. We surveyed bereaved parents from 2011 to discover how they felt about the care they received and to look for their views on the bereavement team. Study design Parents were contacted to explain the objectives of the survey and to obtain their consent. Two copies were then sent to each home, one for each partner. Results In total 36 completed questionnaires were returned: 21/29 mothers, 15/28 fathers. Only 38% of respondents strongly agreed that on diagnosis they received written information or contact support. While most felt that they were facilitated in spending high quality precious time with their baby, not all felt this need was met on the labour ward. The majority, 90%, of parents felt post-mortem was explained sensitively but not always clearly. Only 47% of parents met their consultant during their inpatient care, and half felt they did not have a timely postnatal visit to meet a consultant. All parents said that “kindness and sensitivity of staff” was a vital aspect of their care. Discussion These findings identify routes for modifying the care we provide. Prioritising our bereaved parents’ views supports and expands an open culture, in which we empower our parents in their continuing grieving process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.347

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
O’Connell, O., Verling, A., & O’Donoghue, K.
Affiliations
  • Cork University Hospital (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-04
Volume
98
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
A100.4-A101
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2328104818
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
stillbirth, bereavement support, bereaved parents, grief, parental satisfaction, written information, postpartum care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review