Should family members be present at resuscitation?
Abstract
A 1-year-old boy is brought into Accident & Emergency by paramedics receiving CPR. He has been found pale and unresponsive at home. You take handover from the paramedics and continue the resuscitation. Shortly afterwards, the child’s parents arrive, they are visibly distressed watching the events unfold. You wonder if it is better for the parents to stay and watch or be taken to a quiet room, and if there is any evidence available to support one approach above another? In parents/caregivers of children being resuscitated (population), does observing the resuscitation (intervention) improve the family’s psychological coping and satisfaction with care, and what is the opinion on familial presence from health professionals (outcome)? We searched Ovid Medline on 15 March 2019 using the terms (paediatric OR paediatric OR child) AND (resus* OR CPR OR cardiopulmonary) AND (parent* OR famil*) AND (presence OR witness OR observ*) AND (cop* OR stress). A total of 21 papers were identified. Inclusion criteria were full-text articles with search items identified within the title. Articles were excluded which did not focus on resuscitation, that were not specific to children or their families, were guidelines or opinion pieces. Seven articles were chosen for further review, four were disregarded as they were duplicated within the systematic review. Three papers were therefore included, these were qualitative, reflecting the clinical question asked. These studies are summarised in table 1. View this table: Table 1 Summary of included studies Family-centred care is an important concept within paediatric medicine. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health endorses parents and caregivers to be involved in their children’s care, in order …
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The test of capacity is based on when the advance directive was made, rather than at the time of the suicide attempt.
“This is because the test of capacity is based on when the advance directive was made, rather than at the time of the suicide attempt. 212”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [212]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
- Authors
- Timmis, V.
- Affiliations
- Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Timmis, Victoria
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-11-28
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506.1-508
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2991535013
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- family presence during resuscitation, pediatric resuscitation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, family-centered care, clinician attitudes, parents of children, emergency department resuscitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review