The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1748 Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures – Next Generation Cancer Patient Monitoring?
Open accessAbstract
Background Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) are validated, digitalised health questionnaires with roots in clinical trials, created as a way of re-establishing and empowering the patient voice. ePROMs are now utilised in over 30 different medical specialties, and it is recognised that their unique abilities for detecting symptomology and other quality of life (QOL) issues directly from the patient make them highly suitable as an adjunct in routine clinical care. Their use, particularly in adult Oncology, has brought a number of benefits to light, however use of ePROMs in child and young adult groups remains limited. Objectives The literature review is part of a service evaluation at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, to better understand the benefits ePROMs bring to patients, as well as the barriers and facilitators of implementing such a service. Methods We searched PubMed for the terms: ‘Patient Reported Outcome Measure’ or ‘PROM’ or ‘PRO’ AND ‘cancer’ or ‘carcinoma’ or ‘onco*’ and selected papers relevant to the implementation of ePROM services into clinical care. There were 100 relevant titles. Results Improved communication: Improvements have been seen in the quantity and type of symptoms/QOL issues reported , better prioritisation and focussing of the consultation, shared decision-making and treatment goals, patient involvement in care, and as a facilitator of open dialogue and discussion of sensitive topics. Acceptability: Patients find ePROM services highly acceptable, tend to prefer electronic over paper questionnaires, and most patients report that ePROMs are a good way to communicate with their medical team. Symptom Detection and Management: Evidence suggests that practitioners frequently underestimate patients’ experience of symptoms. ePROMs have been shown to consistently improve symptom discussions and onward management, as well as detection of therapy-related adverse events (particularly chemotherapy) Improved Healthcare Process: Studies have shown that ePROMs can reduce A&E attendance, unplanned hospital admissions or unnecessary hospital appointments. ePROM completion has been used to tailor the follow-up of patients and also to report symptoms in real-time, enabling the acute medical team to action the outcomes as necessary. Better QOL: Several studies have demonstrated improvement in symptom scores as well as global QOL with ePROM use. Better Overall Survival: In an oncology population, it has now been shown that successful ePROM services can improve patient survival due to their unique benefits in symptom detection and management. Barriers and Facilitators to ePROM use: A number of barriers to ePROM use are discussed at the level of the patient, the practitioner and the organisation, as well as approaches to mitigate these. Conclusions Digitalised personal healthcare is the next generation in patient monitoring; ePROM services are being rolled out across a number of adult specialties but their use in child and young adult groups is limited. Here we present a multitude of benefits that ePROMs are known to have, and share some of the barriers and facilitators when considering establishing a new ePROMs service. The benefits of ePROMs should (and can) be shared by adults and children alike, and should particularly be considered in paediatric haematology and oncology populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vercell, A., Gasteiger, N., Yorke, J., & Dowding, D. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104931 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Shipman, L. A., & Faivre-Finn, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- ORCID
- Shipman, Lee Aaron
- Venue
- Abstracts
- Published
- 2021-09-30
- Pages
- A475.2-A476
- OpenAlex
- W3202016487
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Abstracts (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- electronic patient-reported outcome measures, pediatric oncology, symptom detection, quality of life, shared decision-making, patient acceptability, barriers and facilitators, chemotherapy side effects, emergency admissions, patient empowerment, follow-up care, overall survival
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review