Cited by 127Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

Differential effects of epratuzumab on peripheral blood B cells of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus versus normal controls

Jacobi, A M, Goldenberg, D M, Hiepe, F, Radbruch, A, Burmester, G R, Dörner, T·2008·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective B lymphocytes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus and other autoimmune diseases, resulting in the introduction of B cell-directed therapies. Epratuzumab, a humanised anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, is currently in clinical trials, although its effects on patients' B cells are not completely understood. Methods This study analysed the in vivo effect of epratuzumab on peripheral B cell subsets in 12 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and also addressed the in vitro effects of the drug by analysing anti-immunoglobulin-induced proliferation of isolated B cells obtained from the peripheral blood of 11 additional patients with lupus and seven normal subjects. Results Upon treatment, a pronounced reduction of CD27(-) B cells and CD22 surface expression on CD27(-) B cells was observed, suggesting that these cells, which mainly comprise naïve and transitional B cells, are preferentially targeted by epratuzumab in vivo. The results of in vitro studies indicate additional regulatory effects of the drug by reducing the enhanced activation and proliferation of anti-immunoglobulin-stimulated lupus B cells after co-incubation with CD40L or CpG. Epratuzumab inhibited the proliferation of B cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus but not normal B cells under all culture conditions. Conclusions Epratuzumab preferentially modulates the exaggerated activation and proliferation of B cells from patients with lupus in contrast to normal subjects, thus s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2007.075762

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobi, A. M., Goldenberg, D. M., Hiepe, F., Radbruch, A., Burmester, G. R., & Dörner, T.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology (US)
  • German Rheumatism Research Centre (DE)
Corresponding author
Dörner, T
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
450-457
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022596631
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
epratuzumab, systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, B cell subsets, B cell activation, B cell proliferation, anti-immunoglobulin stimulation, CD40 ligand, CpG, autoimmune disease therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cells, Cultured, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Lymphocyte Activation, Male, B-Lymphocyte Subsets, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7, Cell Proliferation, Sialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review