The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To investigate and compare the prevalence, comorbidities and management of gout in practice in the UK and Germany. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with gout, identified through the records of 2.5 million patients in UK general practices and 2.4 million patients attending GPs or internists in Germany, using the IMS Disease Analyzer. Results: The prevalence of gout was 1.4% in the UK and Germany. Obesity was the most common comorbidity in the UK (27.7%), but in Germany the most common comorbidity was diabetes (25.9%). The prevalence of comorbidities tended to increase with serum uric acid (sUA) levels. There was a positive correlation between sUA level and the frequency of gout flares. Compared with those in whom sUA was <360 μmol/l (<6 mg/dl), odds ratios for a gout flare were 1.33 and 1.37 at sUA 360–420 μmol/l (6–7 mg/dl), and 2.15 and 2.48 at sUA >530 μmol/l ( >9 mg/dl) in the UK and Germany, respectively (p<0.01). Conclusions: The prevalence of gout in practice in the UK and Germany in the years 2000–5 was 1.4%, consistent with previous UK data for 1990–9. Chronic comorbidities were common among patients with gout and included conditions associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension. The importance of regular monitoring of sUA in order to tailor gout treatment was highlighted by data from this study showing that patients with sUA levels ⩾360 μmol/l (⩾6 mg/dl) had an increased risk of gout flares.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Febuxostat Compared with Allopurinol in Patients with Hyperuricemia and Gout
Becker, M. A., Schumacher, H. R., Wortmann, R. L., MacDonald, P. A., Eustace, D., Palo, W. A., Streit, J., & Joseph-Ridge, N. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050373 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout
Richette, P., Doherty, M., Pascual, E., Barskova, V, Becce, F., Castañeda-Sanabria, J., Coyfish, M., Guillo, S., Jansen, T. L., Janssens, H., et al. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707 · Cited by 1,681
Self-citationRichette, P., & Bardin, T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60883-7 · Cited by 915
Cleophas, M. C. P., Crişan, T. O., Lemmers, H., Toenhake-Dijkstra, H., Fossati, G., Jansen, T. L., Dinarello, C. A., Netea, M. G., & Joosten, L. A. B. (2016) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206258 · Cited by 139
MacDonald, T. M., Ford, I., Nuki, G., Mackenzie, I. S., De Caterina, R., Findlay, E., Hallas, J., Hawkey, C. J., Ralston, S., Walters, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005354 · Cited by 93
Self-citationFactors modulating the inflammatory response in acute gouty arthritis
Cleophas, M. C., Crişan, T. O., & Joosten, L. A. B. (2017) · Current Opinion in Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000000366 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Annemans, L., Spaepen, E., Gaskin, M., Bonnemaire, M., Malier, V, Gilbert, T., & Nuki, G.
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 960-966
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131879291
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/ard.2007.076232
- The paper
- Annemans, L., Spaepen, E., Gaskin, M., Bonnemaire, M., Malier, V, Gilbert, T., & Nuki, G. (2008). Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.076232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.