Use of “spydergrams” to present and interpret SF-36 health-related quality of life data across rheumatic diseases
Open accessAbstract
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a generic measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), validated and cross-culturally translated, which has been extensively utilised in rheumatology. In randomised controlled trials and observational studies, SF-36 provides rich data regarding HRQOL; but as typically portrayed, patterns of disease and treatment-associated effects can be difficult to discern. "Spydergrams" offer a simplified means to visualise complex results across all domains of SF-36 in a single figure: depicting disease and population-specific patterns of decrements in HRQOL compared with age and gender-matched normative data, as well as providing a tool for interpreting complex treatment-associated or longitudinal changes. Utilising spydergrams as a standard format to illustrate and report changes in SF-36 across different rheumatic diseases can greatly facilitate analyses and interpretations of clinical trial results, as well as providing patients an accessible means to compare baseline scores and treatment-associated improvements with normative data from individuals without arthritis. Furthermore, SF-6D utility scores based on mean changes across all eight domains of SF-36 are suggested as a quantitative means of summarising changes illustrated by spydergrams, offering a universal metric for cost-effectiveness analyses of therapeutic interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of the SF-36 Physical Functioning single subscale is supported by recent literature as being a better measure of change for clinical trials than composite summary scores.
“The use of this single subscale of the SF-36 is supported by recent literature as being a better measure of change for clinical trials than the composite summary scores that can be derived from this same measure [30; 57].”
From Internet-enhanced management of fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial (2010) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.1
Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-54 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Internet-enhanced management of fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial
Williams, D. A., Kuper, D., Segar, M., Mohan, N., Sheth, M., & Clauw, D. J. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.034 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strand, V, Crawford, B., Singh, J., Choy, E., Smolen, J. S., & Khanna, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Strand, V
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1800-1804
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2950749
- OpenAlex
- W2130240143
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 17.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR053858)
- National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024151, K12RR023263)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Keywords
- SF-36, health-related quality of life, rheumatic diseases, arthritis, reference values, treatment effects, cost-effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Data Display, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Rheumatic Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Antirheumatic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review