Cited by 88Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

Use of “spydergrams” to present and interpret SF-36 health-related quality of life data across rheumatic diseases

Open access
Strand, V, Crawford, B, Singh, J, Choy, E, Smolen, J S, Khanna, D·2009·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a generic measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), validated and cross-culturally translated, which has been extensively utilised in rheumatology. In randomised controlled trials and observational studies, SF-36 provides rich data regarding HRQOL; but as typically portrayed, patterns of disease and treatment-associated effects can be difficult to discern. "Spydergrams" offer a simplified means to visualise complex results across all domains of SF-36 in a single figure: depicting disease and population-specific patterns of decrements in HRQOL compared with age and gender-matched normative data, as well as providing a tool for interpreting complex treatment-associated or longitudinal changes. Utilising spydergrams as a standard format to illustrate and report changes in SF-36 across different rheumatic diseases can greatly facilitate analyses and interpretations of clinical trial results, as well as providing patients an accessible means to compare baseline scores and treatment-associated improvements with normative data from individuals without arthritis. Furthermore, SF-6D utility scores based on mean changes across all eight domains of SF-36 are suggested as a quantitative means of summarising changes illustrated by spydergrams, offering a universal metric for cost-effectiveness analyses of therapeutic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2009.115550

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of the SF-36 Physical Functioning single subscale is supported by recent literature as being a better measure of change for clinical trials than composite summary scores.

    “The use of this single subscale of the SF-36 is supported by recent literature as being a better measure of change for clinical trials than the composite summary scores that can be derived from this same measure [30; 57].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strand, V, Crawford, B., Singh, J., Choy, E., Smolen, J. S., & Khanna, D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Strand, V
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
68
Issue
12
Pages
1800-1804
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130240143
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR053858)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024151, K12RR023263)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
SF-36, health-related quality of life, rheumatic diseases, arthritis, reference values, treatment effects, cost-effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Data Display, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Rheumatic Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Antirheumatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review