Cited by 28Streptococcal Infections and TreatmentsSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsOrthopedic Infections and Treatments

A clinical and serological comparison of group A versus non-group A streptococcal reactive arthritis and throat culture negative cases of post-streptococcal reactive arthritis

Open access
Jansen, Tim L Th A, Janssen, Matthijs, Traksel, Rene, de Jong, Alphons J L·1999·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective To identify clinical and serological differences of patients with reactive arthritis after infection with Lancefield group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GAS), compared with non-group A-that is, group C or G streptococci (NGAS:GCS/GGS), and a group of culture negative or unidentified streptococci (GUS). Methods A prospective study of consecutive patients with reactive arthritis after serologically or culture confirmed infection with beta-haemolytic streptococci, presenting to the outpatient department of rheumatology from January 1992 until January 1998. Alternative causes for reactive arthritis were excluded. Main outcome measures were clinical and serological characteristics including antistreptolysine-O (ASO) and antideoxyribonuclease-B (antiDNase-B) antibody titres. Results 41 patients (female/male ratio 22/19; mean (SD) age 38 (13) years) with reactive arthritis were included. Culture of throat swab was positive in 13 cases (32%): 6 (15%) GAS, 7 NGAS (17%), that is, 5 (12%) GCS, 2 (5%) GGS. In 28 cases throat culture remained negative resulting in a group of unidentified streptococci; antibiotic pre-treatment had been given by the general practitioner in 18 cases (64%). Arthritis was non-migratory, the number of arthritic joints in GAS and NGAS was similar, whereas in NGAS patients fewer joints were involved than in GUS: mean (SEM) 36 swollen joint index: 3.3 (1.0) in NGAS v 5.6 (1.0) in GUS (p<0.005); 28 swollen joint index: 2.9 (1.0) in NGAS v 4.3 (0.8) in GUS (p<0.05). Extra-articular manifestations-that is, erythema nodosum/ multiforme, AV conduction block or hepatitis-were observed after GAS or GUS infection, but not after NGAS infection. ASO and/or antiDNase-B rose significantly in all patients. The maximal titres for ASO and antiDNase-B in 41 PSRA patients were: mean (SEM) 1242 (232) U/l and 890 (100) U/l respectively; the maximal ASO titres were similar in the three groups: mean (SEM) 1125 (185) in GAS, 625 (160) in NGAS (GAS v NGAS: p=0.17), and 1430 (320) U/l in GUS (NGAS v GUS: p=0.10). AntiDNase-B titres were: mean (SEM) 1075 (180) in GAS, 375 (105) in NGAS (GAS v NGAS: p<0.01), and 995 (125) U/l in GUS (NGAS v GUS: p<0.005). ASO: antiDNase-B ratios were: mean (SEM) 0.89 (0.21) in GAS, 2.60 (0.76) in NGAS (GAS v NGAS: p<0.05), and 1.43 (0.28) in GUS (NGAS v GUS: p=0.12). Conclusion Post-streptococcal reactive arthritis occurs not infrequently. Differentiation of PSRA based on the causative streptococcal strain is frequently thwarted by negative throat cultures. Sometimes extra-articular manifestations are present that exclude NGAS as the causative organism. Serologically, lower antiDNase-B titres may be indicative for primary NGAS infection; the ASO/antiDNase-B ratio may be of additive value for differentiation in cases of a negative throat culture: the higher ASO/antiDNase-B ratios suggesting primary NGAS infection. In reactive arthritis, serological monitoring consisting of a simultaneous titration of antiDNase-B and ASO, seems to be of clinical importance to trace GAS induced cases, especially when throat cultures remain negative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.58.7.410

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An additional serological criterion-elevated antiDNase-B or an ASO/antiDNaseB ratio <1.4-improves the criteria set in the presented population.

    “An additional serological criterion, that is, either the elevated antideoxyribonuclease-B or the lower antistreptolysin-O/antideoxyribonuclease-B ratio (<1.4), as described previously [5], may be applied elegantly and leads to an improved criteria set in our presented population.”

    From Differentiation of PSRA due to Group A and due to Nongroup A Streptococci in Patients with Early Arthritis and Elevated Antisteptolysin-O at Presentation (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results report higher anti-DNase-B titres and a lower mean ASO/anti-DNase-B ratio in group A than non-group A cases; the Discussion says the combined measurements may aid differentiation. The paper does not establish <1.4 as a cutoff. Improvement of the citing authors’ criteria set in their own population is their conclusion, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An ASO/antiDNaseB ratio >1.5 at 4-10 weeks after pharyngitis/tonsillitis suggests NGAS-induced PSRA.

    “whereas ratio >1.5, a plea for NGAS-induced PSRA [5]”

    From Differentiation of PSRA due to Group A and due to Nongroup A Streptococci in Patients with Early Arthritis and Elevated Antisteptolysin-O at Presentation (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says higher ASO/antiDNase-B ratios were suggestive of NGAS infection, and the Results report a higher mean ratio in NGAS than GAS patients. The paper does not establish a >1.5 cutoff or specify 4–10 weeks after throat infection as the window for that interpretation; the Serological Measurements section describes sampling at several time points. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An ASO/antiDNaseB ratio <1.40 at 4-10 weeks after pharyngitis/tonsillitis suggests GAS-induced reactive arthritis.

    “ratio <1.40 a plea for GAS-induced reactive arthritis”

    From Differentiation of PSRA due to Group A and due to Nongroup A Streptococci in Patients with Early Arthritis and Elevated Antisteptolysin-O at Presentation (2009) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (page not indicated) report a lower mean ASO/antiDNase-B ratio in GAS than NGAS reactive arthritis (0.89 versus 2.60), and the Discussion says the ratio may help distinguish the groups. The paper does not establish a <1.40 cutoff or specify a 4–10-week diagnostic window. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 1 Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever: Jones crite- ria, 1992 update. JAMA 1992;268:2069-73.
  2. Arnold MH, Tyndall A. Post-streptococcal reactive arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1989;48:686-8.
  3. Deighton C. Beta haemolytic Streptococci and reactive arthritis in adults. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:475-82.
  4. Jansen TLThA, Janssen M, De Jong AJL, Jeurissen MEC. Are post-streptococcal reactive arthritis (PSRA) and acute rheumatic fever (ARF) separate sequelae of beta- haemolytic streptococcal (BHS) infection? [Abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:S186.
  5. Jansen TLThA, Janssen M, Van Riel PLCM. Grand rounds in rheumatology: Acute rheumatic fever or post- streptococcal reactive arthritis: a clinical problem revisited. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:335-40.
  6. Gaunt PN, Seal DV. Group G streptococcal infection of joints and joint prostheses. J Infect 1986;13:115-23.
  7. Rogerson SJ, Beeching NJ. Reactive arthritis complicating group G streptococcal septicaemia. J Infect 1990;20: 155-8.
  8. Young L, Deighton CM, Chuck AJ. Reactive arthritis and group G streptococcal pharyngitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51:1268.
  9. Leitch DN, Holland CD. Reactive arthritis, -haemolytic streptococcus and staphylococcus aureus. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:912.
  10. Feuer J, Spiera H. Acute rheumatic fever in adults: A resur- gence in the Hasidic jewish community. J Rheumatol 1997; 24:337-40
  11. Ben-Dov I, Berry E. Acute rheumatic fever in adults over the age of 45 years: an analysis of 23 patients together with a review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1980;10: 100-10.
  12. Prevoo MLL, Van Riel PLCM, Van't Hof MA, Van Rijswijk MH, Van Leeuwen MA, Kuper HH, et al. Validity and reli- ability of joint indices: a longitudinal study in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1993;32: 589-94.
  13. Bisno AL. Group A streptococcal infections and acute rheu- matic fever. N Engl J Med 1991;325:783-93.
  14. Feinstein AR, Spagnuolo M. The clinical patterns of acute rheumatic fever: a reappraisal. Medicine 1962;41:279-305.
  15. Beerman H. Erythema nodosum, a survey of recent literature. Am J Med Sci 1952;223:433-46.
  16. Barnert AL, Terry EE, Persellin RH. Acute rheumatic fever in adults. JAMA 1975;232:925-9.
  17. Nydick I, Tang J, Stollerman GH, Wroblewski F, Ladue JS. The influence of rheumatic fever on serum concentrations of the enzyme glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase. Circula- tion 1955;12:795-806.
  18. Roos K. The diagnostic value of symptoms and signs in acute tonsillitis in children over the age 10 and in adults. Scand J Infect Dis 1985;17:259-67.

Authors
Jansen, T. L. T. A., Janssen, M., Traksel, R., & de Jong, A. J. L.
Affiliations
Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Matthijs
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
410-414
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045092854
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Keywords
post-streptococcal reactive arthritis, reactive arthritis, Streptococcus pyogenes, throat culture, serological response, extra-articular manifestations, erythema nodosum, hepatitis
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Pharynx, Serologic Tests, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Arthritis, Reactive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review