Cited by 5Organ Donation and TransplantationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burden of organ donation after euthanasia in patients with psychiatric disorder

Open access
Maes, Gwendolyn, Oude Voshaar, Richard, Bollen, Jan, Marijnissen, Radboud·2022·BMJ Case Reports

Abstract

Organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) is rarely performed but the number has gradually increased over the years. It has been suggested that the preparatory investigations for organ donation parallel to the medical-legal procedures for euthanasia may be too much of a burden for the patients and their relatives. Furthermore, dying in an intensive care unit might contribute to this burden. Based on two patients who were granted euthanasia based on a psychiatric disorder, we show that the actual burden may be minimal for some patients and their relatives and may even be helpful in their process of euthanasia. Therefore, we propose that providing patients with information about donation of organs after euthanasia may be important to incorporate early in the medical-legal process of euthanasia instead of waiting for the patient to bring up organ donation, as currently advised in the Dutch guideline for ODE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bcr-2021-246754

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Van Dijk, 2013, Orgaandonatie Na euthanasie bij EEN patiënt Met EEN neurodegeneratieve aandoening, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 157
  2. Mulder, 2017, Richtlijn donatie Na euthanasie, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 161
  3. Dutch Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual reports from 2012-2020. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl; [Accessed Jul 2021].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Maes, G., Oude Voshaar, R., Bollen, J., & Marijnissen, R.
Affiliations
  • University Center for Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Marijnissen, Radboud
Venue
BMJ Case Reports
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-07
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
e246754
ISSN
1757-790X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283793560
Cited by
5
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Case Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
euthanasia, mental illness, organ donation, intensive care unit, family burden, patient information, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Euthanasia, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Tissue and Organ Procurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review