The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The epidemiological challenge of the most frequent eye cancer: retinoblastoma, an issue of birth and death
Abstract
Many papers on retinoblastoma open with a statement that it is the most common primary intraocular cancer in children and a rare disease. True enough. After reflecting a little longer on the epidemiology of eye cancer, however, this statement probably should be revised to read: “retinoblastoma is the most frequent primary intraocular cancer and is gaining importance rapidly.” Let us substantiate this claim and evaluate its consequences in some detail. First, just how frequent is retinoblastoma? Not an easy question to answer because investigators are estimating its incidence in many ways. A recent issue featured two papers on the subject from the Western hemisphere. MacCarthy and coworkers,1 who analysed data from 1601 children with retinoblastoma diagnosed in England, Scotland and Wales between 1963 and 2002, arrive at an annual incidence rate of 3.5 per million children less than 15 years of age. Broaddus and colleagues2 from the USA estimate the rate to be 11.8 per million children below 5 years of age, based on 658 entries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme database from 1975 to 2004. MacCarthy and coworkers also provide a cumulative incidence estimate of 53 per million for the first 14 years of life, which is useful because by that age, essentially all retinoblastomas have been detected, and they report that 95% of tumours were diagnosed before the age of 5 years.1 Presuming that this percentage is constant, one can calculate the corresponding estimate to be 62 per million for the SEER study. Although they are of the same order of magnitude, the estimates, or any estimate based on the number of children of particular age, will be influenced by differences in child and adolescent mortality between countries, the more so the wider is the age cohort considered. Because retinoblastoma is …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tumor Syndromes Predisposing to Osteosarcoma
Hameed, M., & Mandelker, D. (2018) · Advances in Anatomic Pathology · doi:10.1097/pap.0000000000000190 · Cited by 109
At-Risk Populations for Osteosarcoma: The Syndromes and Beyond
Calvert, G. T., Randall, R. L., Jones, K. B., Cannon-Albright, L., Lessnick, S., & Schiffman, J. D. (2012) · Sarcoma · doi:10.1155/2012/152382 · Cited by 90
Li, J., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Xia, X., & Zhang, C. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.085 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kivela, T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-08-24
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1129-1131
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984536924
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.