The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY: III. BRANCHES
Open accessAbstract
THE pioneer worker in the study of the ophthalmic artery, particularly its branches and their variations, was Meyer (1887), whose observations on twenty cases have been accepted more or less as classical for the last three- quarters of a century.No detailed investigation has since been carried out in this field and the descriptions of the branches of this artery which appear in the various text-books of anatomy and ophthalmology merely reflect his conclusions.Moreover, little information regarding the branches and their anomalies is available in the literature.It was therefore thought desirable to study this problem afresh in detail. MaterialThis study was carried out on 59 human orbits obtained from 36 cadavers from the dissection room.In 23 cadavers both orbits were examined, and only one side in the remaining thirteen.All the cadavers were those of persons past middle age, except three which were of children aged 4, 11, and 12 years. MethodNeoprene latex was injected in situ, either through the internal carotid artery or through the most proximal part of the ophthalmic artery, after opening the skull and removing the brain.The artery was first irrigated with water.After the injection, the part was covered with cotton wool soaked in 10 per cent.formalin for from 24 to 48 hours to coagulate the latex.The roof of the orbit was then opened and the ophthalmic artery and its branches were carefully studied with a low-power stereoscopic binocular dissection microscope.In the present paper the pattern of each of the various branches is described separately, depending on whether the ophthalmic artery crosses over or under the optic nerve in the second part of its course (Hayreh and Dass, 1962b); the two arrangements lead to obvious differences, each with its own characteristics. Observations and DiscussionThe branches of the ophthalmic artery may be classified conveniently in three ways (Whitnall, 1932):(A) According to the order of origin of the branches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hayreh, S. S. (2009) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.11.002 · Cited by 656
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
The Blood Supply of the Optic Nerve Head and the Evaluation of it — Myth and Reality
Hayreh, S. S. (2001) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00004-0 · Cited by 386
Self-citationHayreh, S. S. (2006) · Eye · doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702377 · Cited by 288
Self-citationUnraveling the Enigma of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Rizzo, J. F. (2019) · Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000870 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayreh, S. S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1962-04-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-247
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002911019
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY: III. BRANCHES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.46.4.212
- The paper
- Hayreh, S. S. (1962). THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY: III. BRANCHES. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.46.4.212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.