Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. I. Terminology and pathogenesis.

Open access
Hayreh, S S·1974·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

In anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) there is a comparatively sudden loss of vision in the entire eye, or in one sector of the field of vision of the eye, initially associated with oedema of the optic disc, which results in optic atrophy within a month or two, leav- ing a permanent visual defect.A large number of such cases have been reported in the literature, but, although this clinical entity is well-known under different names, its pathogenesis and management have till recently been ill-understood.A full understanding of the pathogenesis of AION would make it considerably easier to understand its clinical pattern and management. TerminologyThis condition has been given different eponyms by various authors because of controversy as to its pathogenesis (Hayreh, I974c).The most popular term in the European literature has been "vascular pseudo-papillitis" (Fransois, Verriest, and Baron, I956, I957) and in the English "ischaemic optic neuro- pathy".As will be evident from the pathogenesis of this condition, perhaps the most suitable term is "anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy"; because the condition is ischaemic, involves both the optic nerve head and retrolaminar optic nerve (hence the terms defining it as a disease only of the optic disc are not correct), non-inflammatory (therefore all terms in- cluding the suffix -itis are incorrect), and there is nothing "pseudo-" about it. Pathogenesis Many theories have been postulated to explain the pathogenesis.A review of the literature (Hayreh, I974c) reveals that the site of the lesion in AION is thought to lie in the optic nerve, although some authors considered it to be due to involvement of the retina.It is almost universally agreed that the condition is the result of interference with the circulation of one of these structures.The vast majority of authors, while describing a circulatory lesion in the optic nerve, have made vague statements without being specific as to the exact lesion.However, Fransois and co-workers (Francois and others, 1957; Francois, Verriest, Neetens, and De Rouck, I96I; Francois, Verriest, De Rouck, and Hanssens, i962; Francois and Neetens i969) postulated that AION was due to occlusion of the so-called "central artery of the optic nerve", an artery they only assumed to exist (Franqois and Neetens, 1954, 1956; Frangois, Neetens, and Colette, I955).My anatomical studies on the blood supply of the optic nerve and branches of the ophthalmic artery in about one hundred human specimens (Hayreh, I958, I962, I 963a,b; Singh and Dass, I g60a,b) and those of Beauvieux and Ristitch (1924) and Steele and Blunt (I 956) failed to reveal the presence of any "central artery of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.58.12.955

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Hayreh, S. S.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1974-12-01
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
955-963
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016229083
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. I. Terminology and pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.58.12.955
The paper
Hayreh, S. S. (1974). Anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. I. Terminology and pathogenesis. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.58.12.955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.