The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic factors in primary malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva: a clinicopathological study of 256 cases.
Open accessAbstract
A series of 256 consecutive cases of invasive primary conjunctival malignant melanomas was examined to identify clinical and histopathological prognostic factors. The follow up period varied between 0.3 and 45.9 years (mean 9 years, median 6.3 years). The 5 year survival rate was estimated at 82.9%, the 10 year survival rate at 69.3%. Multiple regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess sex, age, and a number of baseline features of conjunctival malignant melanoma as possible prognostic factors influencing melanoma related mortality. In assessing each potential prognostic factor, the effects of all other factors were taken into account in the modelling process. Tumours in unfavourable locations--that is, those involving the palpebral conjunctiva, fornices, plica, caruncle, and lid margins, were associated with 2.2 times higher mortality compared with (epi)bulbar melanomas. Patients with mixed cell type tumours had about three times higher mortality compared with those with pure spindle cell melanomas, and histological evidence of lymphatic invasion by tumour cells was also a prognostic feature, carrying a fourfold increase in the death rate. Multifocal tumours were associated with a fivefold increase in mortality among those with tumours in favourable (epi)bulbar locations, but were not prognostic in patients with melanomas in unfavourable sites. The death rate was significantly higher in those with initial tumour thickness of more than 4 mm, but only among patients with unfavourably located melanomas. Sex, age, and clinical origin of the tumour (primary acquired melanosis, pre-existing naevus, or de novo) were not useful prognostic indicators in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tumors of the conjunctiva and cornea
Shields, C. L., & Shields, J. A. (2004) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.10.008 · Cited by 535
Shields, C. L. (2000) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.118.11.1497 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Paridaens, A. D., Minassian, D. C., McCartney, A. C., & Hungerford, J. L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-04-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 252-259
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081062769
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic factors in primary malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva: a clinicopathological study of 256 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.78.4.252
- The paper
- Paridaens, A. D., Minassian, D. C., McCartney, A. C., & Hungerford, J. L. (1994). Prognostic factors in primary malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva: a clinicopathological study of 256 cases. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.78.4.252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.