The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana.
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: Suppurative keratitis is a serious problem in all tropical countries, but very little information is available about the causative organisms in Africa. The objectives were to identify the causative organisms and the proportion of cases caused by fungi in southern Ghana, and to determine whether correct decisions about treatment could be made on the basis of Gram stain in the eye clinic. METHODS: Scrapings were taken from corneal ulcers of consecutive new patients presenting at Korle Bu Hospital, Accra, and inoculated on 'chocolate' and Sabouraud's agars. Further scrapings were taken for Gram staining and interpretation in the eye clinic. Duplicate slides were assessed by an experienced microbiologist in the UK. RESULTS: One or more organisms were cultured from 114 of 199 patients (57.3%), the most common being Fusarium species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Fungi, alone or in combination, were isolated from 56% of the patients who had positive cultures. In total, 122 patients (61.3%) had their treatment either determined or altered based on the results of the microbiological diagnosis; in 87 of these solely on the basis of direct microscopic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Infection by filamentous fungi accounted for more than half of the ulcers from which cultures were obtained. Both training in technique and experience in interpretation are necessary for microscopy based diagnosis by staff in the clinic to be of greatest value. Direct microscopy was particularly useful for detecting fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Upadhyay, M. P., Karmacharya, P. C. D., Koirala, S., Tuladhar, N. R., Bryan, L. E., Smolin, G., & Whitcher, J. P. (1991) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76903-x · Cited by 329
Cited by
Leck, A. K., Thomas, P. A., Hagan, M., Kaliamurthy, J., Ackuaku, E., John, M., Newman, M. J., Codjoe, F. S., Opintan, J. A., Kalavathy, C. M., et al. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.11.1211 · Cited by 466
Self-citationGopinathan, U., Garg, P., Fernandes, M., Sharma, S., Athmanathan, S., & Rao, G. N. (2002) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/00003226-200208000-00004 · Cited by 452
Microbial Keratitis in South India: Influence of Risk Factors, Climate, and Geographical Variation
Bharathi, M. J., Ramakrishnan, R., Meenakshi, R., Padmavathy, S., Shivakumar, C., & Srinivasan, M. (2007) · Ophthalmic Epidemiology · doi:10.1080/09286580601001347 · Cited by 332
Fungal keratitis in the Republic of Ireland
Farrell, S., McElnea, E., Moran, S., Knowles, S., & Murphy, C. C. (2017) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2017.82 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagan, M., Wright, E., Newman, M., Dolin, P., & Johnson, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1024-1028
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061246578
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.79.11.1024
- The paper
- Hagan, M., Wright, E., Newman, M., Dolin, P., & Johnson, G. (1995). Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.11.1024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.