The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new classification of ocular surface burns
Open accessAbstract
Ocular burns constitute true ocular emergencies and both thermal and chemical burns represent potentially blinding ocular injuries. Thermal burns result from accidents associated with firework explosions, steam, boiling water, or molten metal (commonly aluminium). Chemical burns may be caused by either alkaline or acidic agents. Common alkaline agents include ammonium hydroxide used in fertiliser production, sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) used for cleaning drains and pipes, and calcium hydroxide found in lime plaster and cement. Alkaline agents are particularly damaging as they have both hydrophilic and lipophilic properties, which allow them to rapidly penetrate cell membranes and enter the anterior chamber. Alkali damage results from interaction of the hydroxyl ions causing saponification of cell membranes and cell death along with disruption of the extracellular matrix. Common acidic agents causing injury include sulphuric acid found in car batteries, sulphurous acid found in some bleaches, and hydrochloric acid used in swimming pools. Acids tend to cause less damage than alkalis as many corneal proteins bind acid and act as a chemical buffer. In addition, coagulated tissue acts as a barrier to further penetration of acid. Acid binds to collagen and causes fibril shrinkage. Historically, it has been recognised that the extent of tissue damage is a prognostic indicator of recovery following ocular surface injury. Recovery of ocular surface burns depends upon the causative agent and the extent of damage to corneal, limbal, and conjunctival tissues at the time of injury. Damage to intraocular structures influences the final visual outcome. Ballen1 first suggested a classification which was later modified by Roper-Hall to provide prognostic guidelines based on the corneal appearance and the extent of limbal ischaemia.2 This classification has become the commonly used benchmark since its introduction in 1965 (Table1). View this table: Table 1 Classification of severity of ocular surface burns by Roper-Hall2 …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limbal Autograft Transplantation for Ocular Surface Disorders
Keivyon, K. R., & Tseng, S. C. G. (1989) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32833-8 · Cited by 1,086
Reconstruction of Damaged Corneas by Transplantation of Autologous Limbal Epithelial Cells
Tsai, R. J.-F., Li, L.-M., & Chen, J.-K. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007133430202 · Cited by 935
Tseng, S. C. G. (1998) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.116.4.431 · Cited by 725
Limbal Stem Cells of the Corneal Epithelium
Dua, H. S., & Azuara-Blanco, A. (2000) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00109-0 · Cited by 653
Self-citationRole of the Pericorneal Papillary Structure in Renewal of Corneal Epithelium
DAVANGER, M., & EVENSEN, A. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/229560a0 · Cited by 638
Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Conjunctival Surface Reconstruction
TSENG, S. C. G., PRABHASAWAT, P., & LEE, S.-H. (1997) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71693-9 · Cited by 453
Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction
Azuara-Blanco, A., Pillai, C. T., & Dua, H. S. (1999) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.83.4.399 · Cited by 435
Self-citationAmniotic membrane transplantation for acute chemical or thermal burns
Meller, D., Pires, R. T. F., Mack, R. J., Figueiredo, F. C., Heiligenhaus, A., Park, W. C., Prabhasawat, P., John, T., McLeod, S. D., Steuhl, K. P., et al. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00024-5 · Cited by 422
Human Allograft Limbal Transplantation for Corneal Surface Reconstruction
Tsai, R. J.-F., & Tseng, S. C. G. (1994) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/00003226-199409000-00003 · Cited by 379
Corneal epithelial wound healing in the absence of limbal epithelium.
Huang, A., & Tseng, S. C. G. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 369
Cited by
Walsh, K., Hughes, I., & Dheansa, B. (2022) · British Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12968/hmed.2020.0056 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- DUA, H. S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1379-1383
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117882176
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new classification of ocular surface burns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.85.11.1379
- The paper
- DUA, H. S. (2001). A new classification of ocular surface burns. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.11.1379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.