The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) response after intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of intraocular neovascular or oedematous diseases. METHODS: The prospective consecutive non-comparative interventional case series study included 71 patients (75 eyes) with progressive exudative age related macular degeneration (n = 64 eyes) or diffuse diabetic macular oedema (n = 11 eyes), who received an intravitreal injection of 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Mean follow up time was 6.86 (SD 2.52) months (range 3.1-14.47 months). RESULTS: IOP increased significantly (p<0.001) from 15.43 (3.26) mm Hg preoperatively to a mean maximum of 23.38 (8.37) mm Hg (range 13-64 mm Hg) postoperatively. An IOP rise to values higher than 21 mm Hg was observed in 39 (52%) eyes. Elevation of IOP occurred about 2 months after the injection. Preoperative predictive factor for the rise in IOP was younger age (p=0.013). It was statistically independent of refractive error, presence of diabetes mellitus, and indication for the injection. In all but one eye, IOP could be lowered to the normal range with topical medication, without development of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes. In the eyes with an elevation of IOP, IOP normalised about 6 months after the injection, without further medication. Eyes undergoing repeatedly intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide showed only an elevation of IOP, if after the first injection a rise of IOP had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: After intravitreal injections of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, an IOP elevation can develop in about 50% of eyes, starting about 1-2 months after the injection. In the vast majority, IOP can be normalised by topical medication, and returns to normal values without further medication about 6 months after the injection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Penfold, P. L., Wong, J. G., Gyory, J., & Billson, F. A. (2001) · Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2001.00407.x · Cited by 97
Cited by
Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection
JONAS, J., DEGENRING, R., KREISSIG, I., AKKOYUN, I., & KAMPPETER, B. (2005) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.042 · Cited by 323
Self-citationSDF-1 is both necessary and sufficient to promote proliferative retinopathy
Butler, J. M., Guthrie, S. M., Koc, M., Afzal, A., Caballero, S., Brooks, H. L., Mames, R. N., Segal, M. S., Grant, M. B., & Scott, E. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200522869 · Cited by 263
Gaballa, S. A., Kompella, U. B., Elgarhy, O., Alqahtani, A. M., Pierscionek, B., Alany, R. G., & Abdelkader, H. (2021) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-020-00843-z · Cited by 255
INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS
PEYMAN, G. A., LAD, E. M., & MOSHFEGHI, D. M. (2009) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e3181a94f01 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonas, J. B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-27
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997013893
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 51.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.87.1.24
- The paper
- Jonas, J. B. (2003). Intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.1.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.