Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 615

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration

Open access
Holz, Frank G, Tadayoni, Ramin, Beatty, Stephen, Berger, Alan, Cereda, Matteo G, Cortez, Rafael, Hoyng, Carel B, Hykin, Philip, Staurenghi, Giovanni, Heldner, Stephanie, Bogumil, Timon, Heah, Theresa, Sivaprasad, Sobha·2015·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Real-life anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy use in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) was assessed in a retrospective, observational study in Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, UK and Venezuela. METHODS: Medical records of patients with wAMD, who started ranibizumab treatment between 1 January 2009 and 31 August 2009, were evaluated. Data were collected until the end of treatment and/or monitoring or until 31 August 2011. RESULTS: 2227 patients who received ≥1 anti-VEGF injection with a baseline visual acuity assessment and ≥1 postbaseline visual acuity assessment for the treated eye were evaluated. Visual acuity improved until about day 120; thereafter, visual acuity gains were not maintained. Mean change in visual acuity score from baseline to years 1 and 2 was +2.4 and +0.6 letters, respectively. Patients received a mean of 5.0 and 2.2 injections in the first and second year, respectively. There were substantial differences in visual outcomes and injection frequency between countries. More frequent visits and injections were associated with greater improvements in visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, fewer injections are administered than in clinical trials. Anti-VEGF treatment resulted in an initial improvement in visual acuity; however, this was not maintained over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01447043.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305327

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 615

Metadata

Authors
Holz, F. G., Tadayoni, R., Beatty, S., Berger, A., Cereda, M. G., Cortez, R., Hoyng, C. B., Hykin, P., Staurenghi, G., Heldner, S., Bogumil, T., Heah, T., & Sivaprasad, S.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-09-05
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
220-226
ISSN
  • 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2079
OpenAlex
W2134161293
Cited by
615
References
20
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305327
The paper
Holz, F. G., Tadayoni, R., Beatty, S., Berger, A., Cereda, M. G., Cortez, R., Hoyng, C. B., Hykin, P., Staurenghi, G., Heldner, S., Bogumil, T., Heah, T., & Sivaprasad, S. (2015). Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.