The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate glaucoma prevalence and disease burden across Asian subregions from 2013 to 2040. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 population-based studies of 1318 primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) cases in 66,800 individuals and 691 primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) cases in 72,767 individuals in Asia. Regions in Asia were defined based on United Nations' (UN) classification of macro-geographic regions. PubMed, Medline and Web of Science databases were searched for population-based glaucoma prevalence studies using standardised criteria published to 31 December 2013. Pooled glaucoma prevalence for individuals aged 40-80 years was calculated using hierarchical Bayesian approaches. Prevalence differences by geographic subregion, subtype and habitation were examined with random effects meta-regression models. Estimates of individuals with glaucoma from 2013 to 2040 were based on the UN World Population Prospects. RESULTS: In 2013, pooled overall glaucoma prevalence was 3.54% (95% credible interval (CrI) 1.83 to 6.28). POAG (2.34%, 95% CrI 0.96 to 4.55) predominated over PACG (0.73%, 95% CrI 0.18 to 1.96). With age and gender adjustment, PACG prevalence was higher in East than South East Asia (OR 5.55, 95% CrI 1.52 to 14.73), and POAG prevalence was higher in urban than rural populations (OR 2.11, 95% CrI 1.57 to 2.38). From 2013 to 2040, South Central Asia will record the steepest increase in number of glaucoma individuals from 17.06 million to 32.90 million compared with other Asian subregions. In 2040, South-Central Asia is also projected to overtake East Asia for highest overall glaucoma and POAG burden, while PACG burden remains highest in East Asia. CONCLUSIONS: Across the Asian subregions, there was greater glaucoma burden in South-Central and East Asia. Sustainable public health strategies to combat glaucoma in Asia are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020
Quigley, H. A. (2006) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 · Cited by 7,394
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
Self-citationWong, W. L., Su, X., Li, X., Cheung, C. M. G., Klein, R., Cheng, C.-Y., & Wong, T. Y. (2014) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70145-1 · Cited by 5,331
Self-citationJAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions
Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3680 · Cited by 1,876
Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis
Bourne, R. R. A., Stevens, G. A., White, R. A., Smith, J. L., Flaxman, S. R., Price, H., Jonas, J. B., Keeffe, J., Leasher, J., Naidoo, K., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70113-x · Cited by 1,831
Cited by
Zhang, N., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Jiang, B. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w · Cited by 353
Sun, Y., Chen, A., Zou, M., Zhang, Y., Jin, L., Li, Y., Zheng, D., Jin, G., & Congdon, N. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053805 · Cited by 163
Shao, S.-C., Su, Y.-C., Lai, E. C.-C., Chang, K.-C., Lee, C.-N., Hung, M.-J., Lai, C.-C., Huang, F.-C., & Hung, J.-H. (2022) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101318 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, E. W., Li, X., Tham, Y.-C., Liao, J., Wong, T. Y., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-06-25
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-85
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2079
- OpenAlex
- W1899771023
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306102
- The paper
- Chan, E. W., Li, X., Tham, Y.-C., Liao, J., Wong, T. Y., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2016). Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.