The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Systematic review of published population based surveys to examine the relationship between primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) prevalence and demographic factors. A literature search identified population-based studies with quantitative estimates of POAG prevalence (to October 2014). Multilevel binomial logistic regression of log-odds of POAG was used to examine the effect of age and gender among populations of different geographical and ethnic origins, adjusting for study design factors. Eighty-one studies were included (37 countries, 216 214 participants, 5266 POAG cases). Black populations showed highest POAG prevalence, with 5.2% (95% credible interval (CrI) 3.7%, 7.2%) at 60 years, rising to 12.2% (95% CrI 8.9% to 16.6%) at 80 years. Increase in POAG prevalence per decade of age was greatest among Hispanics (2.31, 95% CrI 2.12, 2.52) and White populations (1.99, 95% CrI 1.86, 2.12), and lowest in East and South Asians (1.48, 95% CrI 1.39, 1.57; 1.56, 95% CrI 1.31, 1.88, respectively). Men were more likely to have POAG than women (1.30, 95% CrI 1.22, 1.41). Older studies had lower POAG prevalence, which was related to the inclusion of intraocular pressure in the glaucoma definition. Studies with visual field data on all participants had a higher POAG prevalence than those with visual field data on a subset. Globally 57.5 million people (95% CI 46.4 to 73.1 million) were affected by POAG in 2015, rising to 65.5 million (95% CrI 52.8, 83.2 million) by 2020. This systematic review provides the most precise estimates of POAG prevalence and shows omitting routine visual field assessment in population surveys may have affected case ascertainment. Our findings will be useful to future studies and healthcare planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,451
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020
Quigley, H. A. (2006) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 · Cited by 7,394
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
Self-citationThe BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions
Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3680 · Cited by 1,876
Writing Group Members, Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Borden, W. B., Bravata, D. M., Dai, S., Ford, E. S., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182456d46 · Cited by 1,512
Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Adults in the United States
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.532 · Cited by 1,110
Cited by
Weinreb, R. N., Leung, C. K. S., Crowston, J. G., Medeiros, F. A., Friedman, D. S., Wiggs, J. L., & Martin, K. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.67 · Cited by 632
Epidemiology of Glaucoma: The Past, Present, and Predictions for the Future
Allison, K., Patel, D., & Alabi, O. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.11686 · Cited by 600
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Sun, Y., Chen, A., Zou, M., Zhang, Y., Jin, L., Li, Y., Zheng, D., Jin, G., & Congdon, N. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053805 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapetanakis, V. V., Chan, M. P. Y., Foster, P. J., Cook, D. G., Owen, C. G., & Rudnicka, A. R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-93
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2079
- OpenAlex
- W2213541252
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
- The paper
- Kapetanakis, V. V., Chan, M. P. Y., Foster, P. J., Cook, D. G., Owen, C. G., & Rudnicka, A. R. (2016). Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.