The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries
Open accessAbstract
Objectives:To undertake a detailed, large scale epidemiological study of match injuries sustained by professional rugby union players in order to define their incidence, nature, severity, and causes. Methods:A two season prospective design was used to study match injuries associated with 546 rugby union players at 12 English Premiership clubs. Team clinicians reported all match injuries on a weekly basis and provided details of the location, diagnosis, severity, and mechanism of each injury. Match exposures for individual players were recorded on a weekly basis. Loss of time from training and match play was used as the definition of an injury. Results:The overall incidence of injury was 91 injuries/1000 player-hours, and each injury resulted on average in 18 days lost time. Recurrences, which accounted for 18% of injuries, were significantly more severe (27 days) than new injuries (16 days). Thigh haematomas were the most common injury for forwards and backs, but anterior cruciate ligament injuries for forwards and hamstring injuries for backs caused the greatest number of days absence. Contact mechanisms accounted for 72% of injuries, but foul play was only implicated in 6% of injuries. The ruck and maul elements of the game caused most injuries to forwards, and being tackled caused most injuries to backs. The hooker and outside centre were the playing positions at greatest risk of injury. Conclusions:On average, a club will have 18% of their players unavailable for selection as a consequence of match injuries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Montalvo, A. M., Schneider, D. K., Yut, L., Webster, K. E., Beynnon, B., Kocher, M. S., & Myer, G. D. (2019) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096274 · Cited by 259
Managing the Risk of Injury in Sport
Fuller, C. W. (2007) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0b013e31805930b0 · Cited by 88
Self-citationMoore, E., Chalmers, S., Milanese, S., & Fuller, J. T. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01126-5 · Cited by 82
Duke, S. R., Martin, S. E., & Gaul, C. A. (2017) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001838 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, J. H. M., Fuller, C. W., Kemp, S. P. T., & Reddin, D. B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-09-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 757-766
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2109742017
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.