The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anthropometry of young competitive sport rock climbers
Abstract
Background:Adult elite competitive rock climbers are small in stature with low body mass and very low body fat percentage. These characteristics have generated concern that young climbers may attempt body mass reduction to extreme levels with adverse consequences for health and performance. No published anthropometry data for young competitive climbers exist. Objective:To describe the general anthropometric characteristics of junior US competitive rock climbers. Methods:Ninety subjects (mean (SD) age 13.5 (3.0) years) volunteered to participate. All competed at the Junior Competition Climbers Association US National Championship. Anthropometric variables, including height, mass, body mass index (BMI), arm span, biiliocristal and biacromial breadths, skinfold thickness at nine anatomical sites, forearm and hand volumes, and handgrip strength, were measured. Selected variables were expressed as ratio values and as normative age and sex matched centile scores where appropriate. A control group (n = 45) of non-climbing children and youths who participated in a variety of sports activities, including basketball, cross country running, cross country skiing, soccer, and swimming, underwent the same testing procedures in the Exercise Science Laboratory of Northern Michigan University. Results:Mean (SD) self reported climbing ability was 11.80 (1.20), or about 5.11d on the Yosemite decimal system scale. The mean (SD) experience level was 3.2 (1.9) years, and subjects competed in 10 (5) organised competitions over a 12 month period. Despite similarity in age, there were significant differences (p<0.01) between climbers and control subjects for height, mass, centile scores for height and mass, ratio of arm span to height (“ape index”), biiliocristal/biacromial ratio, sum of seven and sum of nine skinfolds, estimated body fat percentage, and handgrip/mass ratio. Despite significantly lower skinfold sums and estimated body fat percentage, no differences were found between climbers and controls for absolute BMI or BMI expressed as a centile score. Conclusions:Young competitive climbers have similar general anthropometric characteristics to elite adult climbers. These include relatively small stature, low body mass, low sums of skinfolds, and high handgrip to mass ratio. Relative to age matched athletic non-climbers, climbers appear to be more linear in body type with narrow shoulders relative to hips. Differences in body composition exist between climbers and non-climbing athletes despite similar BMI values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Youth climbers commonly exhibit an ectomorph body shape, characterized by a small frame, light build, and moderate volume of lean muscle (8, 22).”
From Assessment of Dietary Intake and Eating Attitudes in Recreational and Competitive Adolescent Rock Climbers: A Pilot Study (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“However, our cohort was heavier and taller than the climbers presented in Watts (2003).”
From Assessment of Dietary Intake and Eating Attitudes in Recreational and Competitive Adolescent Rock Climbers: A Pilot Study (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“The average height (165 cm), weight (55.1 kg), and BMI (20.1) of our study cohort closely matched the previous control findings of Watts (22) in athletic adolescents (mean height: 167 cm, mean weight: 54.1 kg).”
From Assessment of Dietary Intake and Eating Attitudes in Recreational and Competitive Adolescent Rock Climbers: A Pilot Study (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1080/02640419308729974 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Br J Sports Med, 33, 14, 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 36, 255
- 10.1055/s-2000-302 · DOI
- 1993, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 207, 87, 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_275_02 · DOI
- 1994, Climbing, 15, 136
- 1996, Rock & Ice, 73, 50
- Norton K, Olds T, eds. Anthropometrica. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1996.
- 1985, Physician and Sports Medicine, 13, 75, 10.1080/00913847.1985.11708879 · DOI
- 1963, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 110, 113, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb17079.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1988, Hum Biol, 60, 709
- 1995, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 35, 20
- 1996, J Sports Sci, 14, 301, 10.1080/02640419608727715 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.31.3.224 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.34.5.359 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00015 · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN19910073 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Michael, M. K., Joubert, L., & Witard, O. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00064 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Watts, P. B., Joubert, L. M., Lish, A. K., Mast, J. D., & Wilkins, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-09-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 420-424
- ISSN
- 0306-3674
- 1473-0480
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropometry of young competitive sport rock climbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsm.37.5.420
- The paper
- Watts, P. B., Joubert, L. M., Lish, A. K., Mast, J. D., & Wilkins, B. (2003). Anthropometry of young competitive sport rock climbers. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.5.420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.