The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The epidemiology of new versus recurrent sports concussions among high school athletes, 2005–2010
Abstract
Objectives: To compare new versus recurrent concussions with respect to constellation of symptoms, symptom severity, symptom resolution; evaluate potential subset differences with respect to gender and sport; and to compare mechanisms and activities associated with new versus recurrent concussions. Methods: Sports-related injury and exposure data were collected for nine sports from 2005 to 2010 from 100 nationally representative US high schools. Results: Nationally, an estimated 732,805 concussions occurred. Of these reported concussions, 13.2% were recurrent. The rate of new concussions was 22.2 per 100,000 athletic exposures while the rate of recurrent concussions was 3.1 per 100,000 athletic exposures (RR 7.23, 95% CI 6.39 to 8.17, p<0.001). While 0.6% of new concussion symptoms took >1 month to resolve, 6.5% of recurrent concussion symptoms took >1 month to resolve (IPR 10.35; 95% CI 4.62 to 23.16; p<0.001). Loss of consciousness was reported more often with recurrent (7.7%) than new concussions (4.4%) (IPR 1.76; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.03; p=0.043). A greater proportion of athletes sustaining recurrent concussions returned to play in >3 weeks (7.5%) or were medically disqualified (16.2%) than athletes sustaining new concussions (3.8%; IPR 1.95; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.77; p=0.047 and 2.9%; IPR 5.58; 95% CI 3.50 to 8.88; p<0.001, respectively). The majority of new and recurrent concussions resulted from contact with another person (73.4% and 77.9%, respectively). Conclusions: Athletes sustaining recurrent concussions had longer symptom resolution times, were kept out of play longer and reported loss of consciousness more frequently than athletes sustaining new concussions. With the possibility of long-term impairment and other negative sequelae, proper management and prevention of concussions at the high school level is imperative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., Bailes, J., McCrea, M., Cantu, R. C., Randolph, C., & Jordan, B. D. (2005) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000175725.75780.dd · Cited by 1,197
Field, M., Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.190 · Cited by 802
Cited by
Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review
Iverson, G. L., Gardner, A. J., Terry, D. P., Ponsford, J. L., Sills, A. K., Broshek, D. K., & Solomon, G. S. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097729 · Cited by 917
Sport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents
Halstead, M. E., Walter, K. D., Moffatt, K., COUNCIL ON SPORTS MEDICINE AND FITNESS, LaBella, C. R., Brooks, M. A., Canty, G., Diamond, A. B., Hennrikus, W., Logan, K., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3074 · Cited by 247
Acabchuk, R. L., Brisson, J. M., Park, C. L., Babbott‐Bryan, N., Parmelee, O. A., & Johnson, B. T. (2021) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12244 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Castile, L., Collins, C. L., McIlvain, N. M., & Comstock, R. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-12-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 603-610
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2100368061
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of new versus recurrent sports concussions among high school athletes, 2005–2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090115
- The paper
- Castile, L., Collins, C. L., McIlvain, N. M., & Comstock, R. D. (2012). The epidemiology of new versus recurrent sports concussions among high school athletes, 2005–2010. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.