Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 788

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium

Open access
Gribble, Phillip A, Delahunt, Eamonn, Bleakley, Chris, Caulfield, Brian, Docherty, Carrie, Fourchet, François, Fong, Daniel Tik-Pui, Hertel, Jay, Hiller, Claire, Kaminski, Thomas, McKeon, Patrick, Refshauge, Kathryn, van der Wees, Philip, Vincenzino, Bill, Wikstrom, Erik·2014·British Journal of Sports Medicine
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

While research on chronic ankle instability (CAI) and awareness of its impact on society and health care systems has grown substantially in the last 2 decades, the inconsistency in participant/patient selection criteria across studies presents a potential obstacle to addressing the problem properly. This major gap within the literature limits the ability to generalise this evidence to the target patient population. Therefore, there is a need to provide standards for patient/participant selection criteria in research focused on CAI with justifications using the best available evidence. The International Ankle Consortium provides this position paper to present and discuss an endorsed set of selection criteria for patients with CAI based on the best available evidence to be used in future research and study designs. These recommendations will enhance the validity of research conducted in this clinical population with the end goal of bringing the research evidence to the clinician and patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 788

Metadata

Authors
Gribble, P. A., Delahunt, E., Bleakley, C., Caulfield, B., Docherty, C., Fourchet, F., Fong, D. T.-P., Hertel, J., Hiller, C., Kaminski, T., McKeon, P., Refshauge, K., van der Wees, P., Vincenzino, B., & Wikstrom, E.
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-11-19
Volume
48
Issue
13
Pages
1014-1018
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
DOI
10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175
OpenAlex
W2193011214
Cited by
788
References
30
FWCI
34.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175
The paper
Gribble, P. A., Delahunt, E., Bleakley, C., Caulfield, B., Docherty, C., Fourchet, F., Fong, D. T.-P., Hertel, J., Hiller, C., Kaminski, T., McKeon, P., Refshauge, K., van der Wees, P., Vincenzino, B., & Wikstrom, E. (2014). Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.