The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attacking the pandemic of physical inactivity: what is holding us back?
Abstract
Physical inactivity was characterised as a global pandemic in the 2012 Lancet series on physical activity and health.1 The extent of the pandemic, causes and potential solutions were further explored in other papers in the 2012 and 2016 series, and recommendations derived from these papers and an associated workshop are summarised by Ding et al. 2 This paper builds on these syntheses of global knowledge and assesses progress or the lack thereof in addressing the global pandemic of physical inactivity. Ding et al noted the substantial growth of research on physical activity and public health, progress in integrating physical activity into public health policy and practice and make recommendations for closing still important gaps in knowledge. However, population level advances in public health programmes and policies lag behind those seen in equivalently important areas of public health such as HIV prevention, maternal mortality and tobacco control. Clearly, one of the reasons for lack of progress is that physical inactivity, much like diet, obesity and diabetes, is a complex problem requiring solutions across many sectors and at many levels. There is no silver bullet for physical activity promotion. In the current editorial, we examine whether we are failing to implement proven strategies or do not yet truly understand what works to increase population levels of physical activity and close with recommendations for researchers and policymakers. Physical activity is now widely accepted as a global public health issue with many countries including it within national public health plans. Unfortunately, physical activity is often treated as a secondary factor hidden in broad non-communicable disease planning efforts. The 2018 WHO Global Action Plan for Physical Activity (GAPPA) may be the best manifestation of physical activity joining the mainstream of public health.3 It is well elucidated, evidence-based and engages multiple sectors, strategies and …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reis, R. S., Salvo, D., Ogilvie, D., Lambert, E. V., Goenka, S., & Brownson, R. C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30728-0 · Cited by 719
Self-citationPratt, M., Sarmiento, O. L., Montes, F., Ogilvie, D., Marcus, B. H., Perez, L. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60736-3 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Cited by
Hall, G., Laddu, D. R., Phillips, S. A., Lavie, C. J., & Arena, R. (2021) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.005 · Cited by 804
Ekkekakis, P., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2023) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102295 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratt, M., Ramirez Varela, A., Salvo, D., Kohl III, H. W., & Ding, D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-11-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 760-762
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2986037354
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attacking the pandemic of physical inactivity: what is holding us back? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101392
- The paper
- Pratt, M., Ramirez Varela, A., Salvo, D., Kohl III, H. W., & Ding, D. (2020). Attacking the pandemic of physical inactivity: what is holding us back? British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.