Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of plasma exchange in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Walsh, Michael, Collister, David, Zeng, Linan, Merkel, Peter A, Pusey, Charles D, Guyatt, Gordon, Au Peh, Chen, Szpirt, Wladimir, Ito-Hara, Toshiko, Jayne, David R W·2022·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of plasma exchange on important outcomes in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials investigating effects of plasma exchange in patients with AAV or pauci-immune rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and at least 12 months’ follow-up. Information sources: Prior systematic reviews, updated by searching Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL to July 2020. Risk of bias: Reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Synthesis of results: Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methods. Outcomes were assessed after at least12 months of follow-up and included all-cause mortality, end stage kidney disease (ESKD), serious infections, disease relapse, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Nine trials including 1060 participants met eligibility criteria. There were no important effects of plasma exchange on all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.90 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.27), moderate certainty). Data from seven trials including 999 participants that reported ESKD demonstrated that plasma exchange reduced the risk of ESKD at 12 months (relative risk 0.62 (0.39 to 0.98), moderate certainty) with no evidence of subgroup effects. Data from four trials including 908 participants showed that plasma exchange increased the risk of serious infections at 12 months (relative risk 1.27 (1.08 to 1.49), moderate certainty). The effects of plasma exchange on other outcomes were uncertain or considered unimportant to patients. Limitations of evidence: There is a relative sparsity of events, and treatment effect estimates are therefore imprecise. Subgroup effects at the participant level could not be evaluated. Interpretation: For the treatment of AAV, plasma exchange has no important effect on mortality, reduces the 12 month risk of ESKD, but increases the risk of serious infections. Funding: No funding was received. Registration: This is an update of a previously unregistered systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2014.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2021-064604

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, M., Collister, D., Zeng, L., Merkel, P. A., Pusey, C. D., Guyatt, G., Au Peh, C., Szpirt, W., Ito-Hara, T., & Jayne, D. R. W.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-02-25
Volume
376
Pages
e064604
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214559267
Cited by
158
References
5
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of plasma exchange in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj-2021-064604
The paper
Walsh, M., Collister, D., Zeng, L., Merkel, P. A., Pusey, C. D., Guyatt, G., Au Peh, C., Szpirt, W., Ito-Hara, T., & Jayne, D. R. W. (2022). The effects of plasma exchange in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-064604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.