The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience in Monitoring Gentamicin Therapy during Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Sepsis
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports our experience in monitoring gentamicin therapy during the treatment of 68 episodes of serious Gram-negative sepsis in 65 hospital patients. Most of the patients had major underlying disease. Of those who were adequately treated (peak serum concentrations of 5 μg/ml or more in 72 hours for septicaemia, urinary tract infection, and wound infection; and 8 μg/ml or more at some time during the course of treatment for pneumonia) 84% (46 out of 55) were cured. These serum concentrations could be achieved only by starting with a regimen of 5 mg/kg/day in three divided doses in all adult patients, subsequent dosage being determined by the results of rapid serum assay. The incidence of nephrotoxicity and symptomatic ototoxicity was no greater than in previous series. The main reason for assaying serum gentamicin is to ensure that an adequate dosage is achieved as soon as possible. In patients with impaired renal function or receiving prolonged high dosage assays also serve to guard against an excessive accumulation of gentamicin and an increased risk of toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual for the identification of medical bacteria.
Cowan, S. T., & Steel, K. (1965) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 4,823
MANUAL FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF MEDICAL BACTERIA
Neter, E. (1965) · American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.55.12.2047-a · Cited by 2,583
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy—1969
Parker, R. H. (1971) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(71)90113-5 · Cited by 2,504
Price, D. J. E., & Sleigh, J. D. (1970) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(70)92179-3 · Cited by 305
Martin, C. M., Cuomo, A. J., Geraghty, M. J., Zager, J. R. S., & Mandes, T. C. (1969) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/119.4-5.506 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Correlation of Antimicrobial Pharmacokinetic Parameters with Therapeutic Efficacy in an Animal Model
Vogelman, B., Gudmundsson, S., Leggett, J., Turnidge, J., Ebert, S., & Craig, W. A. (1988) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/158.4.831 · Cited by 720
Single or multiple daily doses of aminoglycosides: a meta-analysis
Barza, M., Ioannidis, J. P., Cappelleri, J. C., & Lau, J. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7027.338 · Cited by 450
Optimizing Aminoglycoside Therapy for Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria
Kashuba, A. D. M., Nafziger, A. N., Drusano, G. L., & Bertino, J. S. (1999) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.43.3.623 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Noone, P., Parsons, T. M. C., Pattison, J. R., Slack, R. C. B., Garfield-Davies, D., & Hughes, K.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1974-03-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5906
- Pages
- 477-481
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2024355003
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience in Monitoring Gentamicin Therapy during Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.1.5906.477
- The paper
- Noone, P., Parsons, T. M. C., Pattison, J. R., Slack, R. C. B., Garfield-Davies, D., & Hughes, K. (1974). Experience in Monitoring Gentamicin Therapy during Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Sepsis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5906.477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.