Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aspirin and Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Reid, J., Macdougall, A. I., Andrews, M. M.·1957·BMJ

Abstract

DICAL JRNAL1071However, the reason for this may be that almost all the lesions were distal and the distance to be covered by the outgrowing axons was therefore not great.Secondary suture should be undertaken as soon as the primary wound has healed and the tissues are free from induration.Primary suture proved an unreliable operation, although some good results were seen.There are important technical reasons why secondary suture is more satisfactory.If, as is often the case, there has been intraneural damage it is much easier to recognize it some weeks after the injury than at the time, because it reveals itself as a palpable and, on section, visible zone of intraneural fibrosis.The resection can be planned accordingly.Furthermore, the epineurium becomes thickened after the injury, and after a few weeks is an ideal structure for holding fine sutures.Most of the repairs reported were secondary.Where there is associated damage to tendons it is best to repair them at the time of injury and simply to approximate the severed nerves.When mobilization of the digits is well advanced secondary suture of the nerves is performed without disturbance of the tendons, which, at the wrist, lie on a deeper plane, and continued movement of the fingers has no adverse effect on the nerve suture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.2.5053.1071

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Reid, J., Macdougall, A. I., & Andrews, M. M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1957-11-09
Volume
2
Issue
5053
Pages
1071-1074
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2013895711
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspirin and Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.2.5053.1071
The paper
Reid, J., Macdougall, A. I., & Andrews, M. M. (1957). Aspirin and Diabetes Mellitus. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5053.1071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.