The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.
Open accessAbstract
In a study in 29 health centre districts in Japan 91 540 non-smoking wives aged 40 and above were followed up for 14 years (1966-79), and standardised mortality rates for lung cancer were assessed according to the smoking habits of their husbands. Wives of heavy smokers were found to have a higher risk of developing lung cancer and a dose-response relation was observed. The relation between the husband's smoking and the wife's risk of developing lung cancer showed a similar pattern when analysed by age and occupation of the husband. The risk was particularly great in agricultural families when the husbands were aged 40-59 at enrolment. The husbands' smoking habit did not affect their wives' risk of dying from other disease such as stomach cancer, cervical cancer, and ischaemic heart disease. The risk of developing emphysema and asthma seemed to be higher in non-smoking wives of heavy smokers but the effect was not statistically significant. The husband's drinking habit seemed to have no effect on any causes of death in their wives, including lung cancer. These results indicate the possible importance of passive or indirect smoking as one of the causal factors of lung cancer. They also appear to explain the long-standing riddle of why many women develop lung cancer although they themselves are non-smokers. These results also cast doubt on the practice of assessing the relative risk of developing lung cancer in smokers by comparing them with non-smokers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Small-Airways Dysfunction in Nonsmokers Chronically Exposed to Tobacco Smoke
White, J. R., & Froeb, H. F. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198003273021304 · Cited by 268
Brunnemann, K. D., & Hoffmann, D. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 46
Cited by
Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · Cited by 2,353
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment
Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., & Roberts, R. S. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806303182605 · Cited by 1,681
Growing out of trouble? Corporate responses to liability risk
Gormley, T. A., & Matsa, D. A. (2011) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr011 · Cited by 690
Relevance of nitrosamines to human cancer
Bartsch, H., & Montesano, R. (1984) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/5.11.1381 · Cited by 494
Indoor air pollution and the lung in low- and medium-income countries
Kurmi, O. P., Lam, K. B. H., & Ayres, J. G. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00190211 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirayama, T.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1981-01-17
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 6259
- Pages
- 183-185
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0267-0623
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2004456560
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.282.6259.183
- The paper
- Hirayama, T. (1981). Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6259.183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.