The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
Open accessAbstract
Background: β-Carboline alkaloids (e.g., harmane) are highly tremorogenic chemicals. Animal protein (meat) is the major dietary source of these alkaloids. The authors previously demonstrated that blood harmane concentrations were elevated in patients with essential tremor (ET) vs controls. Whether this difference is due to greater animal protein consumption by patients or their failure to metabolize harmane is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with ET and controls differ with regard to 1) daily animal protein consumption and 2) the correlation between animal protein consumption and blood harmane concentration. Methods: Data on current diet were collected with a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and daily calories and consumption of animal protein and other food types was calculated. Blood harmane concentrations were log-transformed (logHA). Results: The mean logHA was higher in 106 patients than 161 controls (0.61 ± 0.67 vs 0.43 ± 0.72 g−10/mL, p = 0.035). Patients and controls consumed similar amounts of animal protein (50.2 ± 19.6 vs 49.4 ± 19.1 g/day, p = 0.74) and other food types (animal fat, carbohydrates, vegetable fat) and had similar caloric intakes. In controls, logHA was correlated with daily consumption of animal protein (r = 0.24, p = 0.003); in patients, there was no such correlation (r = −0.003, p = 0.98). Conclusions: The similarity between patients and controls in daily animal protein consumption and the absence of the normal correlation between daily animal protein consumption and logHA in patients suggests that another factor (e.g., a metabolic defect) may be increasing blood harmane concentration in patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vinik, A. I., Maser, R. E., Mitchell, B. D., & Freeman, R. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553 · Cited by 2,044
Lepore, M., Pampanelli, S., Fanelli, C., Porcellati, F., Bartocci, L., Di Vincenzo, A., Cordoni, C., Costa, E., Brunetti, P., & Bolli, G. B. (2000) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142 · Cited by 818
Chow, E., Bernjak, A., Williams, S., Fawdry, R. A., Hibbert, S., Freeman, J., Sheridan, P. J., & Heller, S. R. (2014) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db13-0468 · Cited by 403
Fanelli, C. G., Epifano, L., Rambotti, A. M., Pampanelli, S., Di Vincenzo, A., Modarelli, F., Lepore, M., Annibale, B., Ciofetta, M., Bottini, P., et al. (1993) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.42.11.1683 · Cited by 398
Diamant, M., Lamb, H. J., Groeneveld, Y., Endert, E. L., Smit, J. W. A., Bax, J. J., Romijn, J. A., de Roos, A., & Radder, J. K. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00625-9 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Ewing, D. J., & Clarke, B. F.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1982-10-02
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 6346
- Pages
- 916-918
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2039265716
- Cited by
- 1,235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.285.6346.916
- The paper
- Ewing, D. J., & Clarke, B. F. (1982). Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.285.6346.916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.