The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surveillance of patients attending a diarrhoeal disease hospital in Bangladesh
Open accessAbstract
In October 1979 a surveillance system was set up at the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Hospital at Dacca to study a 4% systematic sample of the 100 000 patients with diarrhoea who come to the hospital for care each year. From December 1979 to November 1980 inclusive, 3550 patients were studied. A recognised pathogenic organism was identified for 66% of patients screened for all pathogens, one-third of whom had a mixed infection with two or more agents. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli was the most common enteropathogen detected in all age groups (detection rate 20%), followed by rotavirus (19%), Campylobacter jejuni (14%), and Shigella (12%). Infants and young children (up to 5 years) were most often infected with rotavirus, enterotoxigenic E coli, and C jejuni and older children (5-14 years) had more infections with enterotoxigenic E coli, Shigella, and E histolytica. Surveillance has helped to define the range of disease among patients attending the Dacca Hospital. Sixty-five per cent of patients complained of watery diarrhoea, a presentation that was significantly more common in patients with Vibrio cholerae 0:1 (91%), enterotoxigenic E coli (78%), rotavirus (77%), and C jejuni (71%) than in all patients studied. Dysentery, defined as a history of diarrhoea with blood, was the presenting complaint of 20% of all patients but 55% of those with Shigella. Only patients with V cholerae 0:1 and enterotoxigenic E coli were at increased risk for severe dehydration. In addition surveillance has been used to identify areas where patient care can be improved and to generate new ideas for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Qadri, F., Svennerholm, A.-M., Faruque, A. S. G., & Sack, R. B. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.3.465-483.2005 · Cited by 956
Epidemiology, Genetics, and Ecology of Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae
Faruque, S. M., Albert, M. J., & Mekalanos, J. J. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.4.1301-1314.1998 · Cited by 931
The Global Impact of Neonatal Infection
Stoll, B. J. (1997) · Clinics in Perinatology · doi:10.1016/s0095-5108(18)30181-7 · Cited by 358
Self-citationLarge epidemic of cholera-like disease in Bangladesh caused by Vibrio cholerae 0139 synonym Bengal
CHOLERAWORKINGGROUPINTERNATION (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92811-7 · Cited by 352
Case-Control Study of Enteropathogens Associated with Childhood Diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh
Albert, M. J., Faruque, A. S. G., Faruque, S. M., Sack, R. B., & Mahalanabis, D. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.11.3458-3464.1999 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoll, B. J., Glass, R. I., Huq, M. I., Khan, M. U., Holt, J. E., & Banu, H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1982-10-23
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 6349
- Pages
- 1185-1188
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2081645539
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surveillance of patients attending a diarrhoeal disease hospital in Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.285.6349.1185
- The paper
- Stoll, B. J., Glass, R. I., Huq, M. I., Khan, M. U., Holt, J. E., & Banu, H. (1982). Surveillance of patients attending a diarrhoeal disease hospital in Bangladesh. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.285.6349.1185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.