Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity.

Open access
Klaus, M H, Kennell, J H, Robertson, S S, Sosa, R·1986·BMJ

Abstract

Because continuous social support during labour is a component of care in many societies but inconsistent in our own, the clinical effect of support during labour on maternal and neonatal morbidity were studied. Social support was provided by female companions. Four hundred and sixty five healthy primigravidous women were enrolled using a randomised design. Compared with 249 women undergoing labour alone 168 women who had supportive female companions throughout labour had significantly fewer perinatal complications (p less than 0.001), including caesarean sections (7% v 17%, p less than 0.01) and oxytocin augmentation (2% v 13%, p less than 0.001), and fewer infants admitted to neonatal intensive care (p less than 0.10). Of the women who had an uncomplicated labour and delivery requiring no interventions, those with a companion had a significantly shorter duration of labour (7.7 hours v 15.5 hours, p less than 0.001). This study suggests that constant human support may be of great benefit to women during labour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Oakley A. Cross-cultural practice. In: Chard T, Richards M, eds. Bm*est and hazards oft/ha new obssetncs. Lavenham, Suffolk: Spastic IntentinlMedical Publications, 1977:18-34.
  2. Dixon WJ, Brown MB, eds. Biomedical compute programs P-series. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
  3. O'Driscoa K, Meagher D. Active Management ofLabor. Piaepa:WB Saunders, 1980.
  4. Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work BA, McCann DS. The relationship of materal anxiety, plasma catecholamines, and plasma cortiso to porsinlabor. Am JOse yeo 1978;132:495-500.
  5. Barto MD, Killam AP, Meschia G. Response of ovine uterine blood flow to epinephrine and nrpinehrine. PTOCSocExpBiolMad 1974;145:966-1003.
  6. I1I Adamsons K, Mueller-HeubwchE, MeyersRE. Productionoffetaasphyxiainetherhesusamonkey by adainiatrtiont of catecholamines to the mother. Amy, 0/me Gyneco 1971;109:24862.

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Klaus, M. H., Kennell, J. H., Robertson, S. S., & Sosa, R.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1986-09-06
Volume
293
Issue
6547
Pages
585-587
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2004047954
Cited by
276
References
2
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585
The paper
Klaus, M. H., Kennell, J. H., Robertson, S. S., & Sosa, R. (1986). Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.