The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity to insulin during treatment with atenolol and metoprolol: a randomised, double blind study of effects on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in hypertensive patients.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To compare the effects of metoprolol and atenolol on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and on insulin response to an intravenous glucose load. DESIGN--Randomised, double blind, double dummy, controlled crossover trial. SETTING--University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. PATIENTS--60 Patients with primary hypertension (diastolic blood pressure when resting supine 95-119 mm Hg on at least two occasions during four to six weeks of treatment with placebo) randomised to receive either metoprolol (n = 30) or atenolol (n = 30) during the first treatment period. INTERVENTIONS--Placebo was given for a run in period of four to six weeks. Metoprolol 100 mg twice daily or atenolol 25 mg twice daily was then given for 16 weeks. The two drugs were then exchanged and treatment continued for a further 16 weeks. END POINT--Evaluation of effects of treatment with metoprolol and atenolol on glucose, insulin, and lipid metabolism and glucose disposal mediated by insulin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Reduction of blood pressure was similar and satisfactory during treatment with both drugs. Glucose uptake mediated by insulin was measured during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp to evaluate patients' sensitivity to insulin. Glucose uptake decreased from 5.6 to 4.5 mg/kg/min when patients were taking metoprolol and from 5.6 to 4.9 mg/kg/min when they were taking atenolol. Both drugs caused a small increase in fasting plasma insulin and blood glucose concentrations and glycated haemoglobin concentration. Despite decreased sensitivity to insulin the increase in insulin concentration in response to an intravenous glucose tolerance test was small, suggesting inhibition of release of insulin. Very low density lipoprotein and low density lipoprotein triglyceride concentrations were increased with both drugs and high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was decreased. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was not affected. CONCLUSIONS--Long term use of metoprolol and atenolol causes metabolic abnormalities that may be related to the increased incidence of diabetes in patients with hypertension who are treated pharmacologically. These results may help to explain why the two drugs have failed consistently to reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease in several large scale studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insulin Resistance in Essential Hypertension
Ferrannini, E., Buzzigoli, G., Bonadonna, R., Giorico, M. A., Oleggini, M., Graziadei, L., Pedrinelli, R., Brandi, L., & Bevilacqua, S. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198708063170605 · Cited by 2,344
Effect of fatty acids on glucose production and utilization in man.
Ferrannini, E., Barrett, E. J., Bevilacqua, S., & DeFronzo, R. A. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci111133 · Cited by 1,050
Lillioja, S., Young, A. A., Culter, C. L., Ivy, J. L., Abbott, W. G., Zawadzki, J. K., Yki-Järvinen, H., Christin, L., Secomb, T. W., & Bogardus, C. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113088 · Cited by 782
The Effect of Growth Hormone on Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Secretion in Man*
BRATUSCH-MARRAIN, P. R., SMITH, D., & DEFRONZO, R. A. (1982) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-55-5-973 · Cited by 321
Cited by
Reaven, G. M., Lithell, H., & Landsberg, L. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199602083340607 · Cited by 1,435
Self-citationInsulin resistance is a characteristic feature of primary hypertension independent of obesity
Pollare, T., Lithell, H., & Berne, C. (1990) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/0026-0495(90)90071-j · Cited by 530
Self-citationBangalore, S., Parkar, S., Grossman, E., & Messerli, F. H. (2007) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.057 · Cited by 290
Lithell, H., Hansson, L., Skoog, I., Elmfeldt, D., Hofman, A., Olofsson, B., Trenkwalder, P., & Zanchetti, A. (2004) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000133730.47372.4c · Cited by 104
Self-citationKomajda, M., Tavazzi, L., Francq, B. G., Böhm, M., Borer, J. S., Ford, I., & Swedberg, K. (2015) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.347 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollare, T., Lithell, H., Selinus, I., & Berne, C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-04-29
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 6681
- Pages
- 1152-1157
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2020577458
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.