Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trial of Maintenance Therapy in Schizophrenia

Open access
Leff, J. P., Wing, J. K.·1971·BMJ

Abstract

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out to determine the value of maintenance therapy with phenothiazines in a population of outpatients who had recently recovered from an acute episode of schizophrenia. The drug was shown to be significantly more effective than the placebo in preventing relapse. The relationship of the trial patients to the population from which they were selected was defined in terms of clinical, historical, and social data. Maintenance therapy seems of little value in patients with a good prognosis and in the severely ill, but it is of value in the indeterminate group between these two extremes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.3.5775.599

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Leff, J. P., & Wing, J. K.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1971-09-11
Volume
3
Issue
5775
Pages
599-604
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2078060913
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trial of Maintenance Therapy in Schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.3.5775.599
The paper
Leff, J. P., & Wing, J. K. (1971). Trial of Maintenance Therapy in Schizophrenia. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5775.599

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.