The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of serial measurements in medical research.
Open accessAbstract
In medical research data are often collected serially on subjects. The statistical analysis of such data is often inadequate in two ways: it may fail to settle clinically relevant questions and it may be statistically invalid. A commonly used method which compares groups at a series of time points, possibly with t tests, is flawed on both counts. There may, however, be a remedy, which takes the form of a two stage method that uses summary measures. In the first stage a suitable summary of the response in an individual, such as a rate of change or an area under a curve, is identified and calculated for each subject. In the second stage these summary measures are analysed by simple statistical techniques as though they were raw data. The method is statistically valid and likely to be more relevant to the study questions. If this method is borne in mind when the experiment is being planned it should promote studies with enough subjects and sufficient observations at critical times to enable useful conclusions to be drawn. Use of summary measures to analyse serial measurements, though not new, is potentially a useful and simple tool in medical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Illingworth PJ, Jung RT, Howie I'W, Isles TE. Reduction in postprandial energy expenditure during pregnancy. BrMedj 1987;294:1573-6.
- Bradley JR, Esans DB, Gore SM, Cowley AJ. Is dialysis hypotension caused by an abnormality of senous tone? Br MedJ 1988;2%:1634-7.
- Fikri MM, Ghalioungui P. Ancylostoma anaemia. Lancet 1937;i:800-2. · DOI
- Wishart J. Growth rate determination in nutrition studies with the bacon pig, and their analysis. Biometrika 1938;30:16-28.
- Oldham PD. A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjects. J Chronic Dis 1962;15:969-77. · DOI · Paper page
- Rowell JG, Walters DE. Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit. Journal ofAgricultural Science (Camb) 1976;87:423-32.
- Healy MJR. Some problems of repeated measurements. In: Bithell JF, Coppi R, eds. Perspectives tn medical statistics. London: Academic Press, 1981: 155-7.
- De Klerk NH. Repeated warnings re repeated measures. Aust N Z 7lMed 1986;16:637-8.
- Armitage P, Berrt G. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1987:355,360,411.
- Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BrMted_7 1986;292:746-50.
- Tsai K-T, Koziol JA. VARCOV 11: a computer program for the multivariate analysis of growth and response curves. Comput Methods Programs Bismed 1988;27:69-74. · DOI
- Kenward MG. A method for comparing profiles of repeated measurements. Applied Statistics 1987;36:296-308. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Staessen, J. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.6.539 · Cited by 1,592
Forette, F., Seux, M.-L., Staessen, J. A., Thijs, L., Birkenhäger, W. H., Babarskiene, M.-R., Babeanu, S., Bossini, A., Gil-Extremera, B., Girerd, X., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03086-4 · Cited by 1,441
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research
Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711978115 · Cited by 1,099
Guidelines for the Design and Statistical Analysis of Experiments Using Laboratory Animals
Festing, M. F. W., & Altman, D. G. (2002) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.43.4.244 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationAsnicar, F., Berry, S. E., Valdes, A. M., Nguyen, L. H., Piccinno, G., Drew, D. A., Leeming, E., Gibson, R., Le Roy, C., Khatib, H. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01183-8 · Cited by 995
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, J. N., Altman, D. G., Campbell, M. J., & Royston, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-01-27
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 6719
- Pages
- 230-235
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2028067695
- Cited by
- 3,136
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 78.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230
- The paper
- Matthews, J. N., Altman, D. G., Campbell, M. J., & Royston, P. (1990). Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.