The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxpentifylline treatment of venous ulcers of the leg.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To determine the effect of oxpentifylline on the healing of venous ulcers of the leg. DESIGN--Double blind, randomised, prospective, placebo controlled, parallel group study. SETTING--Four outpatient clinics treating leg ulcers in England and the Republic of Ireland. PATIENTS--80 Consecutive patients with clinical evidence of venous ulceration of the leg in whom appreciable arterial disease was excluded by the ratio of ankle to brachial systolic pressure being greater than 0.8. INTERVENTIONS--All patients received either oxpentifylline 400 mg three times a day by mouth or a matching placebo for six months (or until their reference ulcer healed if this occurred sooner) in addition to a locally standardised method of compression bandaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The primary end point was complete healing of the reference ulcer within six months. The secondary end point was the change in the area of the ulcer over the six month observation period. RESULTS--Complete healing of the reference ulcer occurred in 23 of the 38 patients treated with oxpentifylline and in 12 of the 42 patients treated with a placebo. Life table analysis showed that the proportion of ulcers healed at six months was 64% in the group treated with oxpentifylline compared with 34% in the group treated with a placebo (log rank test chi 2 = 4.78, p = 0.03), which was significant (odds ratio = 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 2.71). CONCLUSION--Oxpentifylline used in conjunction with compression bandaging improves the healing of venous ulcers of the leg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE CAUSE OF VENOUS ULCERATION
Browse, N. L., & Burnand, K. G. (1982) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90325-7 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Post‐thrombotic syndrome: prevalence, prognostication and need for progress
Prandoni, P., & Kahn, S. R. (2009) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07601.x · Cited by 279
Rossi, A. B. R., & Vergnanini, A. L. (2000) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x · Cited by 270
Leukocytes: Their role in the etiopathogenesis of skin damage in venous disease
Wilkinson, L. S., Bunker, C., Edwards, J. C. W., Scurr, J. H., & Smith, P. D. C. (1993) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/0741-5214(93)90109-y · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Colgan, M. P., Dormandy, J. A., Jones, P. W., Schraibman, I. G., Shanik, D. G., & Young, R. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-04-14
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 6730
- Pages
- 972-975
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2065826403
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxpentifylline treatment of venous ulcers of the leg. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.300.6730.972
- The paper
- Colgan, M. P., Dormandy, J. A., Jones, P. W., Schraibman, I. G., Shanik, D. G., & Young, R. A. (1990). Oxpentifylline treatment of venous ulcers of the leg. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6730.972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.