The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of agreement between clinical information recorded on surgery computers of selected general practitioners and similar information in manual records of letters received from hospital consultants and kept in the general practitioners' files. DESIGN: Hospital consultants' letters in the manual records of selected general practitioners were photocopied and the consultants' clinical diagnoses were compared with diagnoses recorded on computer. SETTING: General practices in the United Kingdom using computers provided by VAMP Health for recording clinical information. SUBJECTS: 2491 patients who received one of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and who attended 58 practices whose computer recorded data were considered after a preliminary review to be of satisfactory quality. RESULTS: Among 1191 patients for whom consultants' letters were forwarded a clinical diagnosis reflecting the diagnosis noted on a consultant letter was present on the computer record for 1038 (87%). CONCLUSION: Clinical information available on the computer records of the general practitioners who participated in this study is satisfactory for many clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychotropic Drug Use and the Risk of Hip Fracture
Ray, W. A., Griffin, M. R., Schaffner, W., Baugh, D. K., & Melton, L. J. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198702123160702 · Cited by 1,006
Postmarketing Follow‐up at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound
Jick, H., Madsen, S., Nudelman, P. M., Perera, D. R., & Stergachis, A. S. (1984) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.1984.tb03328.x · Cited by 58
Self-citationFREQUENCY OF EYE COMPLAINTS AND RASHES AMONG PATIENTS RECEIVING PRACTOLOL AND PROPRANOLOL
Skegg, D. C. G., & Doll, R. (1977) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91602-6 · Cited by 35
Jick, H., Hall, G. C., Dean, A. D., Jick, S. S., & Derby, L. E. (1990) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.1990.tb03569.x · Cited by 26
Self-citationERUPTIVE TUMOURS ON SUN-EXPOSED SKIN AFTER BENOXAPROFEN
FINDLAY, G. H., & Hull, P. R. (1982) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91708-1 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- West R. Saskatchewan health data bases: a developing resource in progress in pharmacoepidemiology. American Journal oJf Preventive Medicine 1988 (suppl):25-7.
- Tilson HH. A proactive approach to monitoring for adverse drug reactions. Journal ofClinical Research and Drug Development 1989;3:39-5 1.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis
Gelfand, J. M., Neimann, A. L., Shin, D. B., Wang, X., Margolis, D. J., & Troxel, A. B. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.14.1735 · Cited by 1,899
Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of Fractures
van Staa, T. P., Leufkens, H. G. M., & Cooper, C. C. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.581 · Cited by 1,297
A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics
Schneeweiß, S., & Avorn, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012 · Cited by 1,290
Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures
Van Staa, T. P., Leufkens, H. G. M., Abenhaim, L., Zhang, B., & Cooper, C. (2000) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.993 · Cited by 1,263
Weiskopf, N. G., & Weng, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681 · Cited by 1,216
Metadata
- Authors
- Jick, H., Jick, S. S., & Derby, L. E.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1991-03-30
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 6779
- Pages
- 766-768
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1669537
- OpenAlex
- W2157604999
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 54.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FD-U-000071-09)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- electronic health records, general practitioners, data validation, hospital-primary care communication, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Data Collection, Diagnosis, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Family Practice, United Kingdom, Humans, Medical Records, Microcomputers, Safety, Correspondence as Topic, Medical Records Systems, Computerized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
