The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of second brain tumour after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of second brain tumour in patients with pituitary adenoma treated with conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. DESIGN: Long term follow up of a cohort of patients with pituitary adenoma and comparison of tumour occurrence with population incidence rates. SETTING: The Royal Marsden Hospital. SUBJECTS: 334 patients with pituitary adenoma treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy (median dose 45 Gy) and followed up for 3760 person years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Second intracranial tumour and systemic malignancy. RESULTS: Five patients developed a second brain tumour: two had astrocytoma, two meningioma, and one meningeal sarcoma. The cumulative risk of developing a second brain tumour over the first 10 years after treatment was 1.3% (95% confidence interval 0.4% to 3.9%) and over 20 years 1.9% (0.7% to 5.0%). The relative risk of a second brain tumour compared with the incidence in the normal population was 9.38 (3.05 to 21.89). There was no excess risk of any other type of second primary malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of second intracranial tumour in patients with pituitary adenoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Although radiation is likely to be the most important factor contributing to the excess risk, further study is required in a cohort of similar patients not receiving radiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement
Biller, B. M. K., Grossman, A. B., Stewart, P. M., Melmed, S., Bertagna, X., Bertherat, J., Buchfelder, M., Colao, A., Hermus, A. R., Hofland, L. J., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2734 · Cited by 853
Mortality in Patients with Pituitary Disease
Sherlock, M., Ayuk, J., Tomlinson, J. W., Toogood, A. A., Aragon-Alonso, A., Sheppard, M. C., Bates, A. S., & Stewart, P. M. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0033 · Cited by 392
Burman, P., Mattsson, A. F., Johannsson, G., Höybye, C., Holmer, H., Dahlqvist, P., Berinder, K., Engström, B. E., Ekman, B., Erfurth, E. M., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-4059 · Cited by 184
Outcomes of proton therapy for patients with functional pituitary adenomas
Wattson, D. A., Tanguturi, S. K., Spiegel, D. Y., Niemierko, A., Biller, B. M. K., Nachtigall, L. B., Bussière, M. R., Swearingen, B., Chapman, P. H., Loeffler, J. S., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.068 · Cited by 125
Antecedent Therapy Versus Detection Bias as Causes of Neoplastic Multimorbidity
Craig, S. L., & Feinstein, A. R. (1999) · American Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1097/00000421-199902000-00013 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Brada, M., Ford, D., Ashley, S., Bliss, J. M., Crowley, S., Mason, M., Rajan, B., & Traish, D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-05-23
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 6838
- Pages
- 1343-1346
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1973059597
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of second brain tumour after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1343
- The paper
- Brada, M., Ford, D., Ashley, S., Bliss, J. M., Crowley, S., Mason, M., Rajan, B., & Traish, D. (1992). Risk of second brain tumour after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.