The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation.
Open accessAbstract
The design, analysis, and interpretation of studies using measures of quality of life vary according to the context of use.In this paper we are primarily con- cerned with quality of life measures in clinical trials but our comments are relevant in other contexts. DesignApart from the usual considerations of good study design, particular issues in studies measuring quality of life are the choice of dimensions and the selection of instruments to measure these dimensions.There are also several practical considerations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Cited by
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2140 · Cited by 1,715
McColl, E., Jacoby, A., Thomas, L., Soutter, J., Bamford, C., Steen, N., Thomas, R., Harvey, E., Garratt, A., & Bond, J. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5310 · Cited by 788
Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments
Beurskens, A. J. H. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Köke, A. J. A. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00149-2 · Cited by 573
Interpretation of quality of life changes
Lydick, E., & Epstein, R. S. (1993) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00435226 · Cited by 527
Lips, P., Cooper, C., Agnusdei, D., Caulin, F., Egger, P., Johnell, O., Kanis, J. A., Kellingray, S., Leplege, A., Liberman, U. A., et al. (1999) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050210 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Spiegelhalter, D., & Cox, D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-11-07
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 6862
- Pages
- 1145-1148
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1968798887
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.305.6862.1145
- The paper
- Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Spiegelhalter, D., & Cox, D. (1992). Quality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretation. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6862.1145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.